Help ? Is this Synodontis Multipunctatus?
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 19 Oct 2006, 05:41
- Location 1: Sweden
- Interests: Synodontis, L066, L104, Corydoras
Help ? Is this Synodontis Multipunctatus?
Is this Synodontis Multipunctatus?
I´m confused, when I look at the ...back of the fish?, caudal fin, and I don´t see the black V.
Help, please!
I´m confused, when I look at the ...back of the fish?, caudal fin, and I don´t see the black V.
Help, please!
Last edited by Buckthorn on 08 Nov 2006, 05:53, edited 1 time in total.
- sidguppy
- Posts: 3827
- Joined: 18 Jan 2004, 12:26
- My articles: 1
- My images: 28
- My aquaria list: 5 (i:0)
- Spotted: 9
- Location 1: Southern Netherlands near Belgium
- Location 2: Noord Brabant, Netherlands
- Interests: African catfishes and oddballs, Madagascar cichlids; stoner doom and heavy rock; old school choppers and riding them, fantasy novels, travelling and diving in the tropics and all things nature.
- Contact:
- sidguppy
- Posts: 3827
- Joined: 18 Jan 2004, 12:26
- My articles: 1
- My images: 28
- My aquaria list: 5 (i:0)
- Spotted: 9
- Location 1: Southern Netherlands near Belgium
- Location 2: Noord Brabant, Netherlands
- Interests: African catfishes and oddballs, Madagascar cichlids; stoner doom and heavy rock; old school choppers and riding them, fantasy novels, travelling and diving in the tropics and all things nature.
- Contact:
- Richard B
- Posts: 6952
- Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 13:19
- I've donated: $20.00!
- My articles: 9
- My images: 11
- My cats species list: 37 (i:0, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 4 (i:0)
- My BLogs: 2 (i:0, p:47)
- Spotted: 10
- Location 1: on the sofa, or maybe at work?
- Location 2: Warwickshire: UK
- Interests: Tanganyika Catfish, African catfish, Non-loricariid sucker-catfish.
Running, drinking, eating, sci-fi, stapelids
Hi everyone
A decent picture would enable us to give a positive ID on a species in most cases. There does seem to be a contaminant element sneeking into imported batches that i presumed educated retailers would identify & label correctly (in the uk anyway), more than there has been in the past.
I am becoming more alarmed at the amount of new hybrids i'm seeing and the (forgive the description) "variation in quality". Some are blatantly obvious whilst others are really nice looking fish without body deformity or curved dorsal spines etc. When i get round to it i must get some photos done & submit for a "rogues gallery" if one can be produced - there seems to be a need as people are often buying what they genuinely think are true species but turn out to be hybrids - nothing wrong with that if it's your thing & you know you are buying a hybrid.
Any further thoughts anyone?
Richard B
A decent picture would enable us to give a positive ID on a species in most cases. There does seem to be a contaminant element sneeking into imported batches that i presumed educated retailers would identify & label correctly (in the uk anyway), more than there has been in the past.
I am becoming more alarmed at the amount of new hybrids i'm seeing and the (forgive the description) "variation in quality". Some are blatantly obvious whilst others are really nice looking fish without body deformity or curved dorsal spines etc. When i get round to it i must get some photos done & submit for a "rogues gallery" if one can be produced - there seems to be a need as people are often buying what they genuinely think are true species but turn out to be hybrids - nothing wrong with that if it's your thing & you know you are buying a hybrid.
Any further thoughts anyone?
Richard B
- MatsP
- Posts: 21038
- Joined: 06 Oct 2004, 13:58
- My articles: 4
- My images: 28
- My cats species list: 117 (i:33, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 10 (i:8)
- My BLogs: 4 (i:0, p:97)
- Spotted: 187
- Location 1: North of Cambridge
- Location 2: England.
If you (or someone else) got some pictures, that would be a great idea to have, even in the Cat-eLog perhaps.Richard B wrote:Hi everyone
A decent picture would enable us to give a positive ID on a species in most cases. There does seem to be a contaminant element sneeking into imported batches that i presumed educated retailers would identify & label correctly (in the uk anyway), more than there has been in the past.
I am becoming more alarmed at the amount of new hybrids i'm seeing and the (forgive the description) "variation in quality". Some are blatantly obvious whilst others are really nice looking fish without body deformity or curved dorsal spines etc. When i get round to it i must get some photos done & submit for a "rogues gallery" if one can be produced - there seems to be a need as people are often buying what they genuinely think are true species but turn out to be hybrids - nothing wrong with that if it's your thing & you know you are buying a hybrid.
Any further thoughts anyone?
Richard B
--
Mats
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 12:01
- Location 1: northampton
- Interests: tanganykan cats and cichlids
Synodontis Hybrids
Your point about setting up a rogues gallery Richard had quite an airing back in August when Lee Finley started a thread about Syno Hybrids that had recieved some coverage in Aqualog News.Sid made the suggestion of including hybrids
photographs on P.C. back then, but nothing further has happened.I also put a URL address on the forum where pictures of the fish in question had been put so we could download them, but I don`t think anyone did.They were put there by Frank Schafer who took the pictures. In a later exchange with Jools, he did express an interest in using them, but by this time they had been removed.Unfortunately at the time I didn`t have much idea about downloading, or much else about computers, hence my suggesting someone else might do it.
Incidentally, the original article is still available to be read on line at http://www.aqualog.de/news/web69/syno69e.pdf .
unfortunately it cannot be printed
photographs on P.C. back then, but nothing further has happened.I also put a URL address on the forum where pictures of the fish in question had been put so we could download them, but I don`t think anyone did.They were put there by Frank Schafer who took the pictures. In a later exchange with Jools, he did express an interest in using them, but by this time they had been removed.Unfortunately at the time I didn`t have much idea about downloading, or much else about computers, hence my suggesting someone else might do it.
Incidentally, the original article is still available to be read on line at http://www.aqualog.de/news/web69/syno69e.pdf .
unfortunately it cannot be printed