Bagarius bagarius

All posts regarding the care and breeding of catfishes from Asia.
Post Reply
KenMan
Posts: 16
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 17:49
Location 1: UK

Bagarius bagarius

Post by KenMan »

Ive read some conflicting eventual size estimates for this fish and was just wondering if it is infact the "dwarf" of the genus. Im confused because here on Planet Catfish it says a size of 7.9" whereas fishbase states a "max size" of 200cm...Anyone have any thoughts on what it may actually attain and how best to keep it (i.e a good sized tank, I wouldnt keep it with anything for fear of it being food...)
All help much appreciated. Cheers
User avatar
sidguppy
Posts: 3827
Joined: 18 Jan 2004, 12:26
My articles: 1
My images: 28
My aquaria list: 5 (i:0)
Spotted: 9
Location 1: Southern Netherlands near Belgium
Location 2: Noord Brabant, Netherlands
Interests: African catfishes and oddballs, Madagascar cichlids; stoner doom and heavy rock; old school choppers and riding them, fantasy novels, travelling and diving in the tropics and all things nature.
Contact:

Post by sidguppy »

it's Bagarius yarelli that's the Big un.

maybe Fishbase synonyms these 2 species?
Valar Morghulis
KenMan
Posts: 16
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 17:49
Location 1: UK

Post by KenMan »

Possibly, however it specifically names it as "dwarf goonch", so it does recognise it as a separate species.
Thanks for the reply
Marc van Arc
Expert
Posts: 5038
Joined: 19 Dec 2004, 14:38
My articles: 20
My images: 61
My catfish: 9
Spotted: 35
Location 2: Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Post by Marc van Arc »

You probably missed it, but this is written under Biology for Bagarius bagarius:

Reported length of 200 cm (Ref. 4537) is incorrect (Maurice Kottelat, pers. comm. with hint to Roberts 1982 (not seen).
KenMan
Posts: 16
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 17:49
Location 1: UK

Post by KenMan »

Yeah I didnt see that part... Thanks for the info Marc
I asked someone who has kept them before what size theirs got to and they said it maxed out at 12", and he kept it in a 55g, and said that he wasnt aggressive.
User avatar
Richard B
Posts: 6952
Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 13:19
I've donated: $20.00!
My articles: 9
My images: 11
My cats species list: 37 (i:0, k:0)
My aquaria list: 4 (i:0)
My BLogs: 2 (i:0, p:47)
Spotted: 10
Location 1: on the sofa, or maybe at work?
Location 2: Warwickshire: UK
Interests: Tanganyika Catfish, African catfish, Non-loricariid sucker-catfish.
Running, drinking, eating, sci-fi, stapelids

Post by Richard B »

As far as i can tell there seems to be a bit of confusion in Bagarius to say the least (at average hobbyist level, anyway). As Sid points out Yarelli is the giant (& B.Bagarius should be the dwarf) but who's to say that is what is accurately labelled in the shop? Additionally there may well be unidentified species imported. I have seen specimens recently at 5-8" which could've been any of 'em - partially as the colour pattern seems to develop over time & body size & also because if there are any key distinguishing features i don't know what they are :oops:

They are great looking fish & need to be kept in tanks with vast areas of substrate - they are fish-eaters but are not the killers like the asian redtail & can suffer from large boisterous tankmates when initially introduced
User avatar
grokefish
Posts: 1554
Joined: 13 Apr 2006, 19:28
My images: 3
My aquaria list: 1 (i:0)
Spotted: 2
Location 1: The Vandart Aquarium South Wales
Interests: Life the universe and everything

Post by grokefish »

I didn't know there was a dwarf one.

Matt
One more bucket of water and the farce is complete.
KenMan
Posts: 16
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 17:49
Location 1: UK

Post by KenMan »

Apparently B.Rutilus and B.Suchas differ from B.Yarrelli and B.Bagarius and the only way to tell the differance between yarellis and B.Bagarius is by size...Colour patterns depend on locality and substrate too I belive. Theyre for sale in Wildwoods though so I would imagine they have some kind of an idea (the also have yarrellis on the list at the moment too).
Post Reply

Return to “Asian Catfishes”