Houston, we have a problem...
These
have been examined more closely by several scientists and specialists, and I believe that we confirmed they are not
Rhyacoglanis, but rather are a type of
, similar to
P. bufonius, but from wrong source, so I'll settle for
.
The mystery is that according to the importer (whom I trust), the exporter swears these are from the highlands of Peru, along the upper Huallaga. That seems rather limiting to
Rhyacoglanis. Checking GBIF.org and Specieslink.net, I find only
Rhyacoglanis pulcher (
R. aff.
pulcher, technically) in this area; no
Pseudopimelodus appear in these collections. But
Pseudopimelodus are known from lower down the river along the Marañon. However, these fish have a very short postcleithral process and their eye shape/position are small and wide-set. These traits are indicative of
Pseudopimelodus.
Six of them in a 4 foot tank works right now while they're 3" - 4" TL, but certainly won't work when they're all a foot long or more.
Ughh. I enjoy these fish. What are the chances these are an undescribed
Pseudopimelodus from the Peruvian highlands that, because of its habitat, doesn't exceed 15cm SL?
Cheers,
Eric