Bagarius vegrandis, new species

For the discussion of catfish systematics. Post here to draw our attention to new publications or to discuss existing works.
Post Reply
User avatar
bekateen
Posts: 9325
Joined: 09 Sep 2014, 17:50
I've donated: $40.00!
My articles: 4
My images: 141
My cats species list: 145 (i:105, k:35)
My aquaria list: 37 (i:14)
My BLogs: 45 (i:150, p:2729)
My Wishlist: 35
Spotted: 183
Location 1: USA, California, Stockton
Location 2: USA, California, Stockton
Contact:

Bagarius vegrandis, new species

Post by bekateen »

Follow up to this:
Silurus wrote: 05 Dec 2020, 11:04The dwarf goonch is finally getting a name.
Ng, H.H. & M. Kottelat. (2021). Description of Bagarius vegrandis, a new species of sisorid catfish from Indochina (Actinopterygii: Siluriformes), with notes on the identity of Bagarius bagarius. Zootaxa, 4926(1). https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4926.1.9

https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/article/vi ... a.4926.1.9
Abstract

, new species, is described from the Chao Phraya and Mekong river drainages. It differs from congeners in having a small maximum body size (to 220 mm SL vs. 520–1400 mm SL) and the adipose-fin origin markedly posterior to (vs. at vertical through or very slightly posterior to) the anal-fin origin. It further differs from congeners in having the following unique combination of characters: ovoid unculiferous plaques on dorsal surface of head, lateral margin of frontal not significantly deflected dorsally, eye diameter 11–15% HL, interorbital distance 23–28% HL, head width 18.3–22.3% SL, head depth 11.1–14.1% SL, filamentous extensions to first pectoral-fin element reaching to anus, dorsal spine width 10.6–13.9 times in its length, body depth at anus 8.7–12.0% SL, neural spines of the 4–6 vertebrae immediately anterior to adipose fin distally flattened but not forming series of prominent bumps along dorsal midline, length of adipose-fin base 10.8–13.0% SL, caudal-peduncle length 19.0–22.4% SL, caudal-peduncle depth 3.2–4.2% SL, 19–20 preanal vertebrae, and 39–40 total vertebrae. Bagarius bagarius (Hamilton, 1822) is demonstrated to be a species restricted to the Indian subcontinent (with Bagrus yarrelli Sykes, 1839, Pimelodus platespogon Valenciennes, in Jacquemont, 1839 and Pimelodus carnaticus Jerdon, 1849 as junior subjective synonyms) and Bagarius lica Volz, 1903 resurrected from synonymy with B. yarrelli as a valid species from Southeast Asia.
  • Keywords: Pisces, taxonomy, morphology, species delimitation, Southeast Asia
Image
Find me on YouTube & Facebook: http://youtube.com/user/Bekateen1; https://www.facebook.com/Bekateen
Buying caves from https://plecocaves.com? Plecocaves sponsor Bekateen's Fishroom. Use coupon code bekateen for 15% off your order.
Also, for you Swifties: Https://youtu.be/ZUKdhXL3NCw
User avatar
Shovelnose
Posts: 1240
Joined: 03 Sep 2008, 09:49
My articles: 5
My images: 116
My catfish: 4
My cats species list: 60 (i:4, k:0)
Spotted: 44
Location 1: Mumbai
Location 2: India

Re: Bagarius vegrandis, new species

Post by Shovelnose »

Is a copy possible Eric?
Balaji

Major: Now what's this... stone, stone, stone, (looks down at his hand) and scissors. Now. Scissors cut everything, don't they?
Sergeant: Not stone, sir.
Major: They're very good scissors!!
User avatar
bekateen
Posts: 9325
Joined: 09 Sep 2014, 17:50
I've donated: $40.00!
My articles: 4
My images: 141
My cats species list: 145 (i:105, k:35)
My aquaria list: 37 (i:14)
My BLogs: 45 (i:150, p:2729)
My Wishlist: 35
Spotted: 183
Location 1: USA, California, Stockton
Location 2: USA, California, Stockton
Contact:

Re: Bagarius vegrandis, new species

Post by bekateen »

Shovelnose wrote: 04 Feb 2021, 03:03 Is a copy possible Eric?
Alas, not from me. But I bet that at least one PCF member has the inside track with one of the authors! ;-) :))

Cheers, Eric
Image
Find me on YouTube & Facebook: http://youtube.com/user/Bekateen1; https://www.facebook.com/Bekateen
Buying caves from https://plecocaves.com? Plecocaves sponsor Bekateen's Fishroom. Use coupon code bekateen for 15% off your order.
Also, for you Swifties: Https://youtu.be/ZUKdhXL3NCw
User avatar
Silurus
Posts: 12419
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
I've donated: $12.00!
My articles: 55
My images: 893
My catfish: 1
My cats species list: 90 (i:1, k:0)
Spotted: 424
Location 1: Singapore
Location 2: Moderator Emeritus

Re: Bagarius vegrandis, new species

Post by Silurus »

I'm still waiting for the Zootaxa editorial office to send me my copy...
Image
AlexGano
Posts: 3
Joined: 03 Sep 2019, 03:22
Location 1: China
Location 2: Jiangsu

Re: Bagarius vegrandis, new species

Post by AlexGano »

So,it means the small Bagarius that recognized as B.bagarius before in China and south-east Asian is now B.lica, and the name B.bagarius belongs to big goonch now?
I'm astonished now. Hope they can have more researches on B.rutilus in the future.
User avatar
Jools
Expert
Posts: 16138
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 15:25
My articles: 198
My images: 948
My catfish: 237
My cats species list: 87 (i:237, k:1)
My BLogs: 7 (i:10, p:202)
My Wishlist: 23
Spotted: 450
Location 1: Middle Earth,
Location 2: Scotland
Interests: All things aquatic, Sci-Fi, photography and travel. Oh, and beer.
Contact:

Re: Bagarius vegrandis, new species

Post by Jools »

AlexGano wrote: 06 Feb 2021, 07:56 So,it means the small Bagarius that recognized as B.bagarius before in China and south-east Asian is now B.lica, and the name B.bagarius belongs to big goonch now?
I'm astonished now. Hope they can have more researches on B.rutilus in the future.
No, it doesn't mean that, if I understand what you're suggesting. The "small" Indochinese Bagarius is B. vegrandis. B. lica includes the Sundaic Southeast Asian populations. The most westerly or Indian species is B. bagarius of which B. yarrelli is a junior synonym (maybe this is what you call "big goonch"?).

The genus page has been updated to reflect the recent work but this is all pretty new, so we may well have missed something.

Hope that helps,

Jools
AlexGano
Posts: 3
Joined: 03 Sep 2019, 03:22
Location 1: China
Location 2: Jiangsu

Re: Bagarius vegrandis, new species

Post by AlexGano »

Jools wrote: 06 Feb 2021, 09:22
AlexGano wrote: 06 Feb 2021, 07:56 So,it means the small Bagarius that recognized as B.bagarius before in China and south-east Asian is now B.lica, and the name B.bagarius belongs to big goonch now?
I'm astonished now. Hope they can have more researches on B.rutilus in the future.
No, it doesn't mean that, if I understand what you're suggesting. The "small" Indochinese Bagarius is B. vegrandis. B. lica includes the Sundaic Southeast Asian populations. The most westerly or Indian species is B. bagarius of which B. yarrelli is a junior synonym (maybe this is what you call "big goonch"?).

The genus page has been updated to reflect the recent work but this is all pretty new, so we may well have missed something.

Hope that helps,

Jools
My misunderstanding, I read it wrong :D. Thank you.
Post Reply

Return to “Taxonomy & Science News”