Page 1 of 1
Otocinclus Mariae, wrong photo?
Posted: 22 May 2018, 07:00
by tsin21
I just noticed that the photo shown here for
is exactly the same photo for otocinclus macrospilus in the seriouslyfish website. And both are credited to the same photo owner.
Planetcatfish:
https://www.planetcatfish.com/common/im ... ge_id=4758
Seriouslyfish:
http://www.seriouslyfish.com/species/ot ... crospilus/
Which species is it really, mariae or macrospilus?
Re: Otocinclus Mariae, wrong photo?
Posted: 29 Sep 2020, 21:15
by Karsten S.
Hi,
I share the doubts, IMHO the living ones are not P. mariae, the conserved ones look ok.
You can use this picture:
Caught in a tributary of Tapanahony, Suriname.
According to the official checklists etc. there is only this one
Otocinclus species in Suriname. However, I cannot tell if this is really the same as type locality (Rio Mamoré, Bolivia) is quite some distance away...
Cheers,
Re: Otocinclus Mariae, wrong photo?
Posted: 21 Nov 2020, 17:10
by Jools
Thanks, I've updated the site accordingly.
Cheers,
Jools
Re: Otocinclus Mariae, wrong photo?
Posted: 22 Nov 2020, 15:59
by Karsten S.
Hi Jools,
I recommend to add the catching location for my picture as well, considering the huge distance to the type locality and Eschmeyer is listing only:
Distribution: Upper Madeira and lower Amazon River basins, Bolivia.
Tapanahony river is a tributary of Marowijne/Maroni river system and not the Amazone.
Cheers,
Re: Otocinclus Mariae, wrong photo?
Posted: 22 Nov 2020, 17:11
by Jools
Ah, sorry, thought I did that.
Jools