Page 1 of 1
I think these hybrids are the same, no need for a new entry
Posted: 23 Feb 2016, 23:06
by Viktor Jarikov
The new entry
imho is the same as the older entry
It appears the new pic of the alleged #5 is merely a younger fish than the ones featured in #4 entry. They go through a drastic pattern change. Here are some pics of what we believe to be young #4:
(mine, whose pics are included in #4 Catelog entry, was from the same batch as seen in the second pic from John Kreatsoulas aka Snookn21)
Re: I think these hybrids are the same, no need for a new entry
Posted: 24 Feb 2016, 00:27
by bekateen
Hi Victor,
I entered that hybrid as a new hybrid, because the info associated with the photo called hybrid(5) is Leiarius marmoratus x P. fasciatum, whereas hybrid(4) is supposedly Leiarius x P. tigrinum.
Would you expect the hybrids to look much different starting with fasciatum instead of tigrinum?
Cheers, Eric
Re: I think these hybrids are the same, no need for a new entry
Posted: 24 Feb 2016, 01:09
by smitty
So clearly two different fish. I also appears that Pseudoplatystoma sp_hybrid(5) has much more defined round circle color markings. But does that anything to do with size and age or is it always like that.
Re: I think these hybrids are the same, no need for a new entry
Posted: 24 Feb 2016, 01:12
by Viktor Jarikov
Thanks, Eric!
The exact parentage of the hybrid or hybrids in question is unknown to us. Only the farmers that make them for food in SA may know. For all intents and purposes, I'd state that the most likely parents of hybrid #4 (and #5) are P. fasciatum (maternal) and L. marmoratus (paternal) but we really will never know (it's a trade secret) neither there is much need or interest to know.
For all we know they may use an inter-TSN spp hybrid for the mother but such increasingly complex guesses are culled by the Occam's razor rule.
All imho and worth $0.02.
Re: I think these hybrids are the same, no need for a new entry
Posted: 24 Feb 2016, 01:26
by bekateen
Hi Victor,
Thanks for the extra info. I know literally nothing about these guys besides what I've seen and read on this site.
Indeed they do look very similar (and @smitty, to answer your question, yes the coloration does change with age and size), so maybe the parent lineage is the same. But in the absence of more definitive info, it seems best to keep them separate, given that the current info - even if questionable - is contradictory.
Cheers, Eric
Re: I think these hybrids are the same, no need for a new entry
Posted: 24 Feb 2016, 13:13
by Viktor Jarikov
It looks like you are a splitter and I am a lumper
It'd be nice to hear from those higher up in the food chain...
Re: I think these hybrids are the same, no need for a new entry
Posted: 24 Feb 2016, 13:19
by bekateen
In this case yes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79c3f/79c3f441eeefabcc325cf141568378cecd0ad1cc" alt="Very Happy :-D"
. Actually, if you read through some older threads, you discover that I'm usually a devout lumper (esp. when it comes to similar L- and C-numbers being considered as unique)! LOL
Hey, why is the lumper depicted as overweight and the splitter gaunt? That seems judgmental! And is that Abraham Lincoln playing the role of the splitter?
Cheers, Eric