Page 1 of 1
Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 03 Dec 2010, 13:09
by Birger Amundsen
I`l start an ID tread for my ID`s instead of starting a new one all the time (since I`m nagging about ID all the time LOL)
I reckoned this i L-333? From the free fish i got)
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 03 Dec 2010, 18:57
by Janne
I would think L66 due the lower body profile, size of eye compared to the size of head and the overall pattern.
Janne
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 03 Dec 2010, 20:22
by Birger Amundsen
You know better than me...
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 07 Dec 2010, 12:29
by Birger Amundsen
Young L-260?
Two different panaque, but what?
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 07 Dec 2010, 13:14
by PlecoCrazy
Birger Amundsen wrote:Young L-260?
Yep, that's what it is. BTW, Looks like there might be a small red sore by its tail.
The last two look like
and
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 07 Dec 2010, 13:31
by Birger Amundsen
Thanks:-)
I belive there`s just some "dirt" on the glass.
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 09 Dec 2010, 16:27
by Birger Amundsen
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 10 Dec 2010, 08:49
by krazyGeoff
Birger Amundsen wrote:Just moved mu group of L-134, but i suspect that they are all males, so need an expert opinion.
Hi Birger,
I think that these are all males.
I have not seen a female Peckoltia with those sorts of bristles on the rear of the body of the fish.
Cheers
Geoff
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 11 Dec 2010, 12:42
by Birger Amundsen
That was my conclusion as well, I will have to try and trade some, since they are rarely for sale as adults here in Norway...
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 18 Dec 2010, 15:46
by Birger Amundsen
Now I`m happy, a friend of mine just picked up 4pcs WC females L-134
What would you guys recommend reg, numbers of males against females?
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 18 Dec 2010, 18:45
by Birger Amundsen
As suggested, I think we agree on this being L-169?
But what is this?
And one of those I always mistake for 066/333?
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 19 Dec 2010, 16:43
by fish fodder
Hi,
I dont think your adult L260 is a L260...the lines seem too few and too far apart, also the body shape seems to be wrong for L260.
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 21 Dec 2010, 21:34
by Elisabeth Dahl
Birger Amundsen wrote:I`l start an ID tread for my ID`s instead of starting a new one all the time (since I`m nagging about ID all the time LOL)
I reckoned this i L-333? From the free fish i got)
L-333
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 28 Dec 2010, 15:21
by Birger Amundsen
Should all be WC females. Any agree? They are about 75-80mm TL
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 04 Jan 2011, 19:49
by Birger Amundsen
For the experts, fry about 15mm TL
(I know what it is)
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 27 Jan 2011, 16:07
by Birger Amundsen
Bought as Farlowella sp? Any idea, vittata?
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 28 Jan 2011, 08:24
by Norman
Hi Birger,
I think this would be
Farlowella amazona.
You can follow by going through the
key to the species
all the best
Norman
Re: Birger`s ID tread.
Posted: 28 Jan 2011, 10:54
by Birger Amundsen
Thanks Norman, interesting...