Page 1 of 1

Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 03 Dec 2010, 13:09
by Birger Amundsen
I`l start an ID tread for my ID`s instead of starting a new one all the time (since I`m nagging about ID all the time LOL)

I reckoned this i L-333? From the free fish i got)

Image

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 03 Dec 2010, 18:57
by Janne
I would think L66 due the lower body profile, size of eye compared to the size of head and the overall pattern.

Janne

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 03 Dec 2010, 20:22
by Birger Amundsen
You know better than me... :-)

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 07 Dec 2010, 12:29
by Birger Amundsen
Young L-260?

Image

Two different panaque, but what?
Image

Image

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 07 Dec 2010, 13:14
by PlecoCrazy
Birger Amundsen wrote:Young L-260?
Yep, that's what it is. BTW, Looks like there might be a small red sore by its tail.

The last two look like and

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 07 Dec 2010, 13:31
by Birger Amundsen
Thanks:-)
I belive there`s just some "dirt" on the glass.

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 09 Dec 2010, 16:27
by Birger Amundsen
Just moved mu group of L-134, but i suspect that they are all males, so need an expert opinion.
All picks of individual picks. I also think that they are from different locations, due to difference in pattern?

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

This one i guess is an adult L-260? quite stunning fish.
Image

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 10 Dec 2010, 08:49
by krazyGeoff
Birger Amundsen wrote:Just moved mu group of L-134, but i suspect that they are all males, so need an expert opinion.
Hi Birger,
I think that these are all males.
I have not seen a female Peckoltia with those sorts of bristles on the rear of the body of the fish.

Cheers

Geoff

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 11 Dec 2010, 12:42
by Birger Amundsen
That was my conclusion as well, I will have to try and trade some, since they are rarely for sale as adults here in Norway...

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 18 Dec 2010, 15:46
by Birger Amundsen
Now I`m happy, a friend of mine just picked up 4pcs WC females L-134 :d
What would you guys recommend reg, numbers of males against females?

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 18 Dec 2010, 18:45
by Birger Amundsen
As suggested, I think we agree on this being L-169?
Image

But what is this?
Image

And one of those I always mistake for 066/333?
Image

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 19 Dec 2010, 16:43
by fish fodder
Hi,

I dont think your adult L260 is a L260...the lines seem too few and too far apart, also the body shape seems to be wrong for L260.

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 21 Dec 2010, 21:34
by Elisabeth Dahl
Birger Amundsen wrote:I`l start an ID tread for my ID`s instead of starting a new one all the time (since I`m nagging about ID all the time LOL)

I reckoned this i L-333? From the free fish i got)

Image

L-333

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 28 Dec 2010, 15:21
by Birger Amundsen
Should all be WC females. Any agree? They are about 75-80mm TL

Image

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 04 Jan 2011, 19:49
by Birger Amundsen
For the experts, fry about 15mm TL :d (I know what it is)

Image

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 27 Jan 2011, 16:07
by Birger Amundsen
Bought as Farlowella sp? Any idea, vittata?

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 28 Jan 2011, 08:24
by Norman
Hi Birger,

I think this would be Farlowella amazona.
You can follow by going through the key to the species

all the best
Norman

Re: Birger`s ID tread.

Posted: 28 Jan 2011, 10:54
by Birger Amundsen
Thanks Norman, interesting...