Page 1 of 1

Sold as L333

Posted: 01 Dec 2010, 16:06
by Amazoniensis
i'm sure its not a L333. what do you think?
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 01 Dec 2010, 16:22
by Yann
Hi!!

Can you make a closeup on the teeth of your fish!!

it will greatly help!!
Cheers
Yann

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 01 Dec 2010, 16:40
by jac
I think it is a

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 01 Dec 2010, 16:49
by MatsP
jac wrote:I think it is a
Pretty sure it's not - I'd suggest it's either or a species.

Nice fish.

--
Mats

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 01 Dec 2010, 17:23
by 2wheelsx2
I don't know what it is, because I don't have the experience like the other guys here, but it's definitely not L333, since I have some of those. I also have some and although the pattern looks similar, it's not quite right and the body shape is all wrong.

[mod edit: Jools: fixed incorrect clog link]

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 01 Dec 2010, 17:33
by Amazoniensis
Ok Yann, i will try to make that...

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 01 Dec 2010, 19:21
by andywoolloo
so you think it's definitely not a hypan? I'm confused between thinking it's a hypan or a peckoltia , his mouth is very small

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 01 Dec 2010, 20:06
by AleGer
I agree with Yann.

The pic of the teeth could help.

Cheers
Alex

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 01 Dec 2010, 20:06
by MatsP
andywoolloo wrote:so you think it's definitely not a hypan? I'm confused between thinking it's a hypan or a peckoltia , his mouth is very small
Small mouth is not a good key - it pretty much rules out Baryancistrus and possibly Ancistrus (among the commonly traded fish). Hypancistrus have few teeth, Peckoltia have quite a lot of teeth, but a fairly small mouth. Panaque have a small number of teeth, but they are different shape than Peckoltia and Hypancistrus.

--
Mats

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 01 Dec 2010, 20:58
by Jackster
I think these could be young (LDA01).
I would lean toward Panaque but here is a photo of a young
wild for comparison.


Image

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 01 Dec 2010, 20:59
by andywoolloo
oh ok thanks Mats!

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 01 Dec 2010, 22:47
by Amazoniensis


[Mod edit:use youtube tags --Mats]

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 01 Dec 2010, 23:40
by Jools
Young Panaque are not patterned like this, the eye is too big for the right Panaque species, there are translucent areas between the unpaired fin rays AND in the video it's natural fright state is to stick its fin up and sit on the bottom. Panaque (olus) will mostly invert onto nearby surfaces.

For me, 100%, - zero doubt in my mind.

Jools

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 02 Dec 2010, 00:54
by andywoolloo
it's beautiful! :-BD

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 02 Dec 2010, 08:14
by MatsP
Seeing the video, I agree with P. compta. When looking at the photos, the stripes looked too straight/symmetrical (if you look at the 10 week old juveniles in the Cat-eLog, you'll see what I was looking for), but in the video, it's very clear that the bands aren't as straight as they look in the still photos.

--
Mats

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 02 Dec 2010, 15:27
by Unungy
L134, Leopard Frog

I've seen some spectacular color in some of them.
Beautiful specimen

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 02 Dec 2010, 17:57
by Amazoniensis
Huge thanks !!!
its definitly a Peckoltia compta L134 sold for a L333.....
Image

Re: Sold as L333

Posted: 03 Dec 2010, 19:30
by Jackster
MatsP wrote:....., the stripes looked too straight/symmetrical (if you look at the 10 week old juveniles in the Cat-eLog, you'll see what I was looking for), but in the video, it's very clear that the bands aren't as straight as they look in the still photos.

--
Mats
That's what I was thinking.