Page 1 of 1
ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 00:25
by chrisinha
So, I went to this pet store... needless to say I was disgusted by how the fish were being treated. One of them had so much fungus growing on his back and his respiration was so rapid... I felt like taking the guy just so that he would die in a better place... seriously. So, what are these? Pictures were taken with my phone, so not the best quality.
common?
this guy had an orangish coloration
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 02:03
by Richard B
the 2nd pic looks like pterygoplichthys gibbiceps & the third pic looks like a rineloricaria species
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 04:31
by Suckermouth
First is some sort of Hypostomus.
The last guy looks like a male Hypancistrus contradens.
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 04:40
by Shane
These are all fishes exported out of Colombia.
The first one is
H. plecostomus from the llanos. #2 the Orinoco form of
P. gibbiceps. #3
R. eigenmanni # 4 is
.
-Shane
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 06:06
by racoll
Shane wrote:# 4 is Loricaria sp`rio_atabapo`.
Shane, did you mean
Suckermouth wrote:The last guy looks like a male Hypancistrus contradens.
Number 5 looks more like
to me.
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 06:11
by Suckermouth
racoll wrote:Suckermouth wrote:The last guy looks like a male Hypancistrus contradens.
Number 5 looks more like
to me.
Understandable, I'm not a pro at ID'ing Hypancistrus.
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 06:54
by chrisinha
Suckermouth, at least you are in the ballpark... i wouldn't even try
Thanks everyone for your inputs! I think it's amazing how you can id these guys so quick! I cant stop thinking about that sick fish though (id'ed by Shane as R. eigenmanni)...
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 08:35
by Martin S
I understand where you are coming from re: the Rineloricaria, but it doesn't look like it stands much of a chance with the damage done, and without knowing what caused it, you could just be transferring something nasty to your tanks, so as hard as it may be, I'd suggest you avoid doing that.
It's certainly an unusual selection of fish, and I'd be very tempted to snap up the Lamontichthys, but only if I had a quarantine tank so I could ensure it's health before risking it with my other fish.
Personally, if the conditions of the Rineloricaria mirror how they keep their fish, I'd have to boycot the shop in future, if only to take away the chance I'd buy something on impulse at a later date and regret it due to the reasons above.
If you do end up buying any fish from this store, then I strongly suggest you do it only if you are able to quarantine them.
Martin
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 10:44
by Jon
From the angle, the sturisomatichthys almost looks like a lamontichthys.
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 10:45
by DutchFry
# 4 looks more like
to me.
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 16:07
by Shane
Shane, did you mean Sturisomatichthys sp`rio_atabapo`
Nope.
# 4 looks more like Lamontichthys llanero to me.
That is what I meant
-Shane
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 17:07
by chrisinha
Martin S wrote:I understand where you are coming from re: the Rineloricaria, but it doesn't look like it stands much of a chance with the damage done, and without knowing what caused it, you could just be transferring something nasty to your tanks, so as hard as it may be, I'd suggest you avoid doing that.
It's certainly an unusual selection of fish, and I'd be very tempted to snap up the Lamontichthys, but only if I had a quarantine tank so I could ensure it's health before risking it with my other fish.
Personally, if the conditions of the Rineloricaria mirror how they keep their fish, I'd have to boycot the shop in future, if only to take away the chance I'd buy something on impulse at a later date and regret it due to the reasons above.
If you do end up buying any fish from this store, then I strongly suggest you do it only if you are able to quarantine them.
Martin
Martin,
I do have a small hospital tank but I agree with you when you say the fish might not even stand a chance. I was thinking if anything just to put it out of its misery instead of letting it die slowly in a filthy tank. Thing is they might not even want to sell it to me or it might have died already
I would never put a sick fish in my tank and judging from what I saw in that store chances are I wouldnt buy a fish from them anyway unless it was some rare finding...
The 2 last fish I posted pictures of were not for sale. I didnt ask why.
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 19:02
by Jon
in retrospect, i'm pretty sure that's not a lamont.
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 23 Nov 2009, 19:11
by MatsP
chrisinha wrote:
Martin,
I do have a small hospital tank but I agree with you when you say the fish might not even stand a chance. I was thinking if anything just to put it out of its misery instead of letting it die slowly in a filthy tank. Thing is they might not even want to sell it to me or it might have died already
I would never put a sick fish in my tank and judging from what I saw in that store chances are I wouldnt buy a fish from them anyway unless it was some rare finding...
The 2 last fish I posted pictures of were not for sale. I didnt ask why.
I would recommend that you DO NOT buy ill fish for any purpose. We shouldn't reward shops for having poor fish-conditions. If they are generally not caring for their fish, report them to the local SPCA (Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) or whatever. Generally you need some sort of license or similar to sell livestock, so you may also ask the local authorities to check up on them too. This has a MUCH better effect on improving the live-stock conditions than "rewarding" the shop by buying the fish.
I have also been known to tell the shop that "this fish would be best off if it was humanely euthanized" - e.g. when Red-tail-cats (tiny) were kept in the same tank as some agressive cichlids, and the red-tails had nearly nothing left of it's tail.
--
Mats
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 24 Nov 2009, 05:39
by chrisinha
I get your point, Mats. Thanks for the advice. I have no intention to go back to that store.
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 24 Nov 2009, 11:03
by DutchFry
Jon wrote:in retrospect, i'm pretty sure that's not a lamont.
Jon, I'm quite confident about # 4. I've seen a lot of these recently, as they are being sold here in my home town, as Sturisoma (which apparently they are not).
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 24 Nov 2009, 11:33
by Shane
in retrospect, i'm pretty sure that's not a lamont.
The more I look at that picture the more I think that the fish looks a little bit like a lot of things I have seen but not the exact same as any I have encountered. A good mouth shot would help. I would certainly buy this fish, if anything, just to try to figure out what it is.
-Shane
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 24 Nov 2009, 12:09
by DutchFry
Ok ok, so I got it wrong! but I was very close at the least
on second thought, I'm quite sure it's
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 24 Nov 2009, 12:17
by Jon
"Jon, I'm quite confident about # 4. I've seen a lot of these recently, as they are being sold here in my home town, as Sturisoma (which apparently they are not)."
Not to step on any toes, but I'm currently keeping stibaros, and have, at some point in my fishkeeping experience, kept all three species in the genus. The more I look at it, the more confused I get. The pectorals, which are usually the hallmark of the genus, are present. The rest of the fish just doesn't look quite right. A better angle would help.
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 24 Nov 2009, 16:40
by chrisinha
the guy at the store told me that this fish wasnt for sale. I didnt ask why. Hmmm. I guess Im going to go back there for better pictures...
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 25 Nov 2009, 04:36
by chrisinha
So I went back there. The guy told me the 3 fish in that tank are not for sale because they are "babies". They will be ready for sale in 3 weeks. Anyway, I asked him what kind of pl*cos they were and he said the one I posted a picture before (pic #5) is a snow ball pl*eco, the one I havent posted any picture of is an orange seam pl*eco and the other fish that you guys are trying to ID (picture #4) is a "royal farlowella" which I dont think it is.
I tried taking more pictures but it's not any better than the first one. The fish wouldnt move.
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 25 Nov 2009, 04:42
by Suckermouth
Oh, I wouldn't touch those fish unless they get better in the next 3 weeks; it looks like there's ich on the L201.
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 25 Nov 2009, 05:08
by Jon
Yeah, definitely lamontichthys. That'll teach me to second guess myself.
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 25 Nov 2009, 10:24
by DutchFry
Yes Jon, and is it llanero or stibaros in your opinion?
I think it a good thing to question other people's opinions! this way we can learn form each other!
and since I never kept any species of Lamontichthys myself, I think you could teach me a thing or two about these lovely critters!
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 25 Nov 2009, 11:55
by Martin S
chrisinha wrote:
Is it me or does the "snowball" have extremely well defined odontodes? None of those are 'babies' in any sense of the word!
Martin
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 25 Nov 2009, 18:34
by Jon
I think it's llanero, but I am not positive.
Aside from the initial die off, they have always proven quite hardy for me. I think it's a matter of tankmates and getting them to eat.
Re: ID's of fish from pet store...
Posted: 26 Nov 2009, 05:08
by Shane
I am pretty sure it is L. llanero as well. One clue is that all the other fishes are from Colombia, so it is likely we are looking at fishes from one shipment.
-Shane