Is this really an L288?
Posted: 24 May 2009, 06:31
Hi again.
I'm back with another group of Pleco's for ID confirmation.
The problem with the restrictive importation regulations here in NZ is that there is now a trend for the L-Number to no longer be listed with the fish. I might be a bit pedantic but I really want to know what I am buying. Anyway... these fish were listed as Big Banded Tiger Pleco, possibly L288. The big banded bit is about as useful as Pretty fish with stripes, so I was not really interested. Then I happened to see one at another LFS, and they were rather attractive. To me they looked more like , instead of . So I ordered and received 6 of them.......
They changed colours, and the bands got darker and lighter as they got over the stress of transport, but in the end I was still not sure what they really might be. Then I got Datz Special All L-Numbers: Habitat, Care & Diet, and a Back to Nature Guide to L-Catfishes by Ingo Seidel, to assist me in my identification.
I have lost the debate with myself and now need some assistance to confirm the Identification of these fish.
I am quite sure that they are Genus Peckoltia, for the following reasons:
Bristles appearing on the pectoral fin spine.
Bristles appearing on the posterior body.
Bristles appearing on the upper caudal fin.
The mouth and detention.
Here is what I think that they might be.
, but not due to the pictures on this site, sorry, the book Back to Nature Guide to L-Catfishes by Ingo Seidel, has pictures of a Juvenile and the banding is still regular. I am unsure though because my specimens have regular thick bands on the face. Also with only 4 registered keepers it seems as though either these fish are rare, not brought into the hobby trade, or sold as a different L number.
, still my strongest vote. The ventral view is very similar and the six month juveniles pictures on this forum are very similar.
, again the book Back to Nature Guide to L-Catfishes by Ingo Seidel, has a different picture. I am unsure though because my specimens have regular thick bands on the face. Also with only 3 registered keepers it seems as though either these fish are rare, not brought into the hobby trade, or sold as a different L number.
, those are virtually my fish, however the other references have quite a different picture, and those pictures have a specimen without regular bands on the face, also with only 1 registered keepers it seems as though either these fish are rare, not brought into the hobby trade, or sold as a different L number. Still even less likely to be brought into NZ.
Another option may be Peckoltia sp. Rio Nhamunda.
I am unable to get any information about where my fish actually came from, but I am pretty sure that they arrived in the same shipment as some if that helps.....
So now it is time for the photos.
The one thing that I do know is that I am not the best at taking photos of fish.
This specimen is a male, I am pretty sure of, due to his like of caves, and the bristles that can be seen with the naked eye, but possibly not so much on my photos.
The first photo is to show gerneal shape and size..... The next is to show the colour better and the head coluration This one is more the banding on the back of the body Photo of the underside to follow.
I'm back with another group of Pleco's for ID confirmation.
The problem with the restrictive importation regulations here in NZ is that there is now a trend for the L-Number to no longer be listed with the fish. I might be a bit pedantic but I really want to know what I am buying. Anyway... these fish were listed as Big Banded Tiger Pleco, possibly L288. The big banded bit is about as useful as Pretty fish with stripes, so I was not really interested. Then I happened to see one at another LFS, and they were rather attractive. To me they looked more like , instead of . So I ordered and received 6 of them.......
They changed colours, and the bands got darker and lighter as they got over the stress of transport, but in the end I was still not sure what they really might be. Then I got Datz Special All L-Numbers: Habitat, Care & Diet, and a Back to Nature Guide to L-Catfishes by Ingo Seidel, to assist me in my identification.
I have lost the debate with myself and now need some assistance to confirm the Identification of these fish.
I am quite sure that they are Genus Peckoltia, for the following reasons:
Bristles appearing on the pectoral fin spine.
Bristles appearing on the posterior body.
Bristles appearing on the upper caudal fin.
The mouth and detention.
Here is what I think that they might be.
, but not due to the pictures on this site, sorry, the book Back to Nature Guide to L-Catfishes by Ingo Seidel, has pictures of a Juvenile and the banding is still regular. I am unsure though because my specimens have regular thick bands on the face. Also with only 4 registered keepers it seems as though either these fish are rare, not brought into the hobby trade, or sold as a different L number.
, still my strongest vote. The ventral view is very similar and the six month juveniles pictures on this forum are very similar.
, again the book Back to Nature Guide to L-Catfishes by Ingo Seidel, has a different picture. I am unsure though because my specimens have regular thick bands on the face. Also with only 3 registered keepers it seems as though either these fish are rare, not brought into the hobby trade, or sold as a different L number.
, those are virtually my fish, however the other references have quite a different picture, and those pictures have a specimen without regular bands on the face, also with only 1 registered keepers it seems as though either these fish are rare, not brought into the hobby trade, or sold as a different L number. Still even less likely to be brought into NZ.
Another option may be Peckoltia sp. Rio Nhamunda.
I am unable to get any information about where my fish actually came from, but I am pretty sure that they arrived in the same shipment as some if that helps.....
So now it is time for the photos.
The one thing that I do know is that I am not the best at taking photos of fish.
This specimen is a male, I am pretty sure of, due to his like of caves, and the bristles that can be seen with the naked eye, but possibly not so much on my photos.
The first photo is to show gerneal shape and size..... The next is to show the colour better and the head coluration This one is more the banding on the back of the body Photo of the underside to follow.