Photo quality not great,sorry he's a bit shy at the moment.
He's about 4" long at the moment.
I just thought the markings were different from the usual pictus,so I bought him
Labelled as a P. Pictus,but I'm not sure
- Suckermouth
- Posts: 1609
- Joined: 28 Nov 2003, 14:29
- My images: 17
- My cats species list: 22 (i:0, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 2 (i:0)
- My BLogs: 6 (i:0, p:237)
- Spotted: 14
- Location 1: USA
- Location 2: Washington, DC
Re: Labelled as a P. Pictus,but I'm not sure
Looks like , at least a fish of that species group.
- Milton Tan
Research Scientist @ Illinois Natural History Survey
Research Scientist @ Illinois Natural History Survey
- Richard B
- Posts: 6952
- Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 13:19
- I've donated: $20.00!
- My articles: 9
- My images: 11
- My cats species list: 37 (i:0, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 4 (i:0)
- My BLogs: 2 (i:0, p:47)
- Spotted: 10
- Location 1: on the sofa, or maybe at work?
- Location 2: Warwickshire: UK
- Interests: Tanganyika Catfish, African catfish, Non-loricariid sucker-catfish.
Running, drinking, eating, sci-fi, stapelids
Re: Labelled as a P. Pictus,but I'm not sure
Both blochii & pictus can be highly variable in body patterns & this one has characteristics of both but i'm not saying yours is a hybrid. I lean towards blochii, partly due to the more robust body
Lou: Every young man's fantasy is to have a three-way.
Jacob: Yeah not with another fu**!ng guy!
Lou: It's still a three-way!
Hot Tub Time Machine: 2010
Jacob: Yeah not with another fu**!ng guy!
Lou: It's still a three-way!
Hot Tub Time Machine: 2010