Page 1 of 1

L172b or ?

Posted: 22 Jul 2007, 00:11
by tenby2
Hi,
can you help me to id this catfish, sold to me as L172b :?:
Image
Sorry only the one pic at the mo, will try and get some more if needed :)
Thanks in advance
Mark

Posted: 22 Jul 2007, 00:27
by MatsP
L172b is (according to several websites with the help of Google - there is no such thing in Cat-eLog or Aqualog L-numbers) a variant of .

I don't know if it's actually a VARIATION, or just plan L. heterodon.

I don't know if this is a correct ID or not, but I can almost certainly say that it's correct genus.

--
Mats

Posted: 22 Jul 2007, 22:35
by tenby2
Thanks Mats.
Only 4" or so that's a shame I was told he/she'd grow to around the 12" mark.
Still there are so many variants :!:
I bought him/her from Ark Aquatics in Canterbury yesterday.
has settled quite well in my 4'er with a few small geos and a S/Am goby. Does however seem a bit shy during the day but is braver when lights are dimmed.
Has been inside flowerpot all day.
Thanks again Mats.

Mark

Posted: 22 Jul 2007, 23:17
by MatsP
Hiding all day is typical "new pleco" behaviour, in my experience. Once they settle in, some types come out a little bit more often, particularly if there's a chance of some tasty food. I have no experience of this genus in itself, so I can't say if it's more or less hidey than others. [And even then, some individuals seem to be more outgoing than others....]

--
Mats

Posted: 26 Jul 2007, 22:36
by tenby2
Thanks again Mat, but I've now been informed by an old mate of mine Mr Andy Fox and have looked it up in my L no book L264 Leporacanthicus Joselimai
Image
here is a better pic, cheers.
if all works out ok it should reach 10" or so.

Posted: 26 Jul 2007, 22:57
by MatsP
I can't say for sure if it's one or the other of the "grey with black spots" - and there's no "key" to the identification in the Cat-eLog.

--
Mats

Posted: 27 Jul 2007, 00:38
by tenby2
I see what you mean Mat.
i'll have to wait for the fish to come out a bit more, but for now I'd say it's more like the Jose than the Hete.
Like you say there is very little difference.

Mark

Posted: 27 Jul 2007, 13:56
by Jon
To me, it appears to be L. heterodon. No leading white edges and something about the coloration strikes me as not L-264esque.

Posted: 27 Jul 2007, 14:16
by tenby2
you could be right Jon, and probably are. also the 263 isn't a million miles away :?
But the longer jaw looks like it most likely is the Heterdon.
I will get some better pics as and when the fish lets me :lol:

Mark

Posted: 27 Jul 2007, 14:18
by MatsP
I think you meant Jon?

--
Mats

Posted: 27 Jul 2007, 14:58
by Jon
L-263 has distinct eyes and an obvious pattern on its hard dorsal ray.

Posted: 27 Jul 2007, 18:29
by tenby2
I have corrected my above post, sorry Jon :oops:
I realise the differences between my fish and L263, but so many share similar markings, if you know what I mean :)

Posted: 28 Jul 2007, 17:46
by Jon
You don't have to be sorry for anything... :D