Should I return "pre-owned" filter?
Posted: 27 Jun 2007, 09:36
I had just bought two Eheim 2215's from an online vendor with a good (and earned reputation)--it's NOT DrsFosterSmith, though--I ended up ordering from a closer location because I wanted other stuff only this merchant had. One of the 2215's was definitely new, never been opened. The other one was missing some internal packaging--a cardboard insert to keep the filter from rattling around inside the box. The canister is scratched and dinged. The plastic bag that holds some smaller parts was ripped open. Everything had been packed back in all wrong. I phoned the merchant and told them that one of the internal screens was missing and they are going to ship me a return label so I can send it back for an exchange.
However after I got off the phone, I did find the "missing" part--entangled in the same-colored hoses. Some rubber feet I had also reported as missing were found as well, wedged in unlikely places, but they were there.
My question is what is ethical? I think the merchant would still consider this a "new" piece of equipment, as it was not actually used on a tank and they probably would not have agreed to an exchange if I hadn't of thought that the internal screen was missing. Now that I've found it, I do have a complete but dinged up filter. As I said, the canister is all scratched up and the intake nozzle on the head of the filter had a pretty good dent in it, too. But...it is just cosmetic damage, and I think it will probably work.
My husband says it was either returned because someone took a look at it and decided it wasn't what they wanted, or that someone in the pet store must have opened it up to check it out. He says the store likely won't consider it "used" and when I send it back there's the chance they may decide not to honor an exchange because the packaging is not in pristine shape. Their return policy specifies returns must be in new packaging--basically everything intact, which this package certainly is not--even though I'm not the one who did it.
I vaguely remember there being a discussion somewhere on here of a situation similar to mine but I have searched for over 20 minutes and couldn't find it. So I apologize having to post an issue I think was discussed here before.
My husband said I could test the filter and if it works, keep it. But how on earth can I test it without setting it up even a little bit, and therefore putting it into a "used" condition? The only thing I have done so far is to put clean water into the canister to make sure it doesn't leak--it does not.
If I keep the filter, do I have to reimburse the merchant for the shipping label they send me? Or do they incur a cost only if I use it? Thanks for any help.
p.s.--I AM a little worried because I have a 2213 I dropped off a counter and looking at it, you can't really tell it is damaged--but I know it was damaged because I heard it crack inside. I worry maybe something similar is true with this new unit, since it didn't have proper internal packaging and the inside of the box is all beat to heck, too.
However after I got off the phone, I did find the "missing" part--entangled in the same-colored hoses. Some rubber feet I had also reported as missing were found as well, wedged in unlikely places, but they were there.
My question is what is ethical? I think the merchant would still consider this a "new" piece of equipment, as it was not actually used on a tank and they probably would not have agreed to an exchange if I hadn't of thought that the internal screen was missing. Now that I've found it, I do have a complete but dinged up filter. As I said, the canister is all scratched up and the intake nozzle on the head of the filter had a pretty good dent in it, too. But...it is just cosmetic damage, and I think it will probably work.
My husband says it was either returned because someone took a look at it and decided it wasn't what they wanted, or that someone in the pet store must have opened it up to check it out. He says the store likely won't consider it "used" and when I send it back there's the chance they may decide not to honor an exchange because the packaging is not in pristine shape. Their return policy specifies returns must be in new packaging--basically everything intact, which this package certainly is not--even though I'm not the one who did it.
I vaguely remember there being a discussion somewhere on here of a situation similar to mine but I have searched for over 20 minutes and couldn't find it. So I apologize having to post an issue I think was discussed here before.
My husband said I could test the filter and if it works, keep it. But how on earth can I test it without setting it up even a little bit, and therefore putting it into a "used" condition? The only thing I have done so far is to put clean water into the canister to make sure it doesn't leak--it does not.
If I keep the filter, do I have to reimburse the merchant for the shipping label they send me? Or do they incur a cost only if I use it? Thanks for any help.
p.s.--I AM a little worried because I have a 2213 I dropped off a counter and looking at it, you can't really tell it is damaged--but I know it was damaged because I heard it crack inside. I worry maybe something similar is true with this new unit, since it didn't have proper internal packaging and the inside of the box is all beat to heck, too.