Page 1 of 1

New Otocinclus

Posted: 26 Dec 2006, 22:24
by Silurus

Can Wonder Woman be far behind?

Posted: 26 Dec 2006, 23:16
by lfinley58
Hello all.

I just had to make a comment on the species name of this fish. On seeing the name - batmani - I thought, no it can't be. But I was wrong. I checked the Etymology section of the paper and there it was. Now we have a loricariid catfish named in honor of the Caped Crusader. Actually, it is pretty cool.

Lee

Posted: 26 Dec 2006, 23:30
by medaka
lee wrote
I just had to make a comment
So do I..
Now we have a loricariid catfish named in honor of the Caped Crusader

I take it, they will be compatible with :-
Corydoras robinae :lol:

batmani and robinae

Posted: 26 Dec 2006, 23:52
by lfinley58
Hi Medaka.

I like it!!!! Wish I'd thought of that.

It may not work well with the respective pronunciations, but the names look good together.

Lee

Posted: 28 Dec 2006, 04:21
by Beersnob
All,

It's neat to see the new oto. It looks to me that the big difference is the "Batman" like symbol on its tail fin. Is there any others for us laymen?

I found out about it tonight at the Greater Detroit Aquarium Society meeting - Dr. Langhammer brought it up.

Let's find some more!

Scott

differences?

Posted: 28 Dec 2006, 11:19
by lfinley58
Hi Beersnob and all.

Beyond the distinctive color pattern of O. batmani there does not appear to be much to go on in regards to eyeball identification. The W-shaped (i.e. bat) mark on the caudal fin plus the body markings (" ...three discrete dark bands on the dorsum, between the dorsal-fin base and the caudal fin.") are noted to be distinguishing features. From our point of view, in regards to identification, I guess that this places it right along side the other "otto" cats with the diagnosis being based on color pattern.

Lee

one more thing

Posted: 28 Dec 2006, 11:26
by lfinley58
Hi all.

The description of O. batmani was based on 10 fish from three different locations : one in Colombia and two in Peru ("near Iquitos"). I certainly don't see any reason why this fish would not make it into the hobby, if it has not already done so.

Lee

Posted: 10 Jan 2007, 15:00
by racoll
I had to check that it wasn't the first of April when I read this!

Thanks for the link Silurus.

Posted: 28 Jan 2007, 22:49
by Erwin
O. batmani was in the hobby already in 2001, acc. to the pictures I took that time. Maybe it was sold under a different name?