Page 1 of 1

Lump on betta?!

Posted: 27 Sep 2006, 16:09
by whiteymoza
My girlfriends Male betta Last years valentines day present! Seems to have a small lump on its right side ewxactly along the lateral line and about 5mm round The scales dont seem to be sticking up much but certainly slightly more than the rest of the body. I suspect this may be early stages of dropsy but Im under the belief that dropsy starts on the abdomen not on the fish's side.. Does anybody have ans surgestions as to what this could be? I dont want my girlfriends fish to die on her just yet!:(

Water quality as far as I believe should be perfect, The tank is a 10g with a fluval 103 external filter. Tank mates are 1x L262 a small bristlenose and two neon tetra.

The betta himself is acting perfectly normal begging for food eating and potroling his tank as normal!

Posted: 27 Sep 2006, 16:24
by MatsP
My wifes Betta had a lump that sounds pretty similar to what you're seeing. I think it's a cancer-growth, but I'm not sure. Our fish lived quite "happily" with this growth for several months, probably more than half a year.

--
Mats

Posted: 17 Oct 2006, 21:11
by whiteymoza
Any ideas? Its getting bigger.

<img src="http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h306/ ... C_0158.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"></a>
<img src="http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h306/ ... C_0161.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"></a>
<img src="http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h306/ ... C_0157.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"></a>

Posted: 17 Oct 2006, 23:06
by zenyfish
Tumor. Bettas live short lives, 2-4 years. Probably normal aging ... if it really bothers the fish, consider euthanasia.

Posted: 18 Oct 2006, 00:58
by Deb
If you can isolate the betta in a separate tank,* I think there would be no harm in trying a salt bath.

In this case, it would be to make him more comfortable and to attempt to shrink the "tumor" or growth, which may be benign. I'd suggest a very mild salt bath in the hospital tank. Dissolve one tablespoon of regular aquarium salt in a cup of warm water for every 5 gallons of aquarium water. For example, in a 10 gallon hospital tank, that would be 2 tablespoons of salt, dissolved. Add the salt water slowly to the aquarium water over two hours, or more. Don't add it all at once. Let the fish have his salty water for three days, and then do a 20% water change, or more. Repeat the treatment in a couple of days. Do it a few more times over the next month if it seems to be helping, and the fish can tolerate it.

I would give this problem a month to run its course or get worse. There may not be anything you can do, but if you want to do something to help, the salt bath is worth trying.

This problem could easily be due to a virus, which means it could go away. There's no harm in trying, but keep an eye on the fish to make sure he's tolerating the salt. It may interfere slightly with gill function, so be ready to diminish the dose, if need be.
Hope he improves!

Deborah
:D

*I say "separate" tank because I don't think the pleco would like the salt bath, and he doesn't need one!

Posted: 18 Oct 2006, 11:22
by MatsP
Looks just like Elvis's lump - didn't seem to bother the fish, but after several months of having a lump, the fish passed away...

--
Mats

Posted: 18 Oct 2006, 12:30
by whiteymoza
The lump doesnt seem to be bothering him in the least hes still as mad as normal very ctive and feeding happily! Eutanasia is out of the question unless his condition worsens..

The salt bath may be an idea Luckilly I have a few spare filters and many spare tanks!

Posted: 18 Oct 2006, 23:31
by zenyfish
Quite honestly ... a salt bath won't do anything except irritate the fish.

There is one other thing you can do. Someone told me they've done this successfully. Anesthesize the fish (I think they used drinking soda, 7Up). Then cut off the tumor with a razor blade.

Posted: 19 Oct 2006, 13:28
by Deb
Zenyfish wrote:
Quite honestly ... a salt bath won't do anything except irritate the fish.
Zenyfish, Iâ??m sure you believe this, but it would carry more weight as a recommendation if you would supply some reasons for why you say this. For example, have you treated bettas in salt baths and had them react poorly? On a thread like this, I think weâ??re obligated to supply more information when challenging a tried and true procedure like a mild salt bath for what is, after all, a fat perchlike fish.

So â?? even though I donâ??t want to beat this point up too much - I think I should post back on this thread to explain why I made the suggestion for the salt bath, in the first place.

Whiteymoza,
this is what I know about the use of therapeutic salt baths.
I have not been able to find, and have never seen, where leading fish authorities say that they know that salt, at low doses, irritates either the eyes or the gills of a freshwater fish. Instead, they seem to say that there is no evidence of it. Certain fish have been reported to not tolerate salt well, even at low doses, but the information is anecdotal and is contradicted by other sources, in similar authoritative positions. I have not seen bettas included in those lists, in any case.

I am not suggesting the routine use of salt or a prolonged exposure to it. In fact, itâ??s imperative that you keep an eye on the fish and adjust the dose as needed. This is easy to do â?? add fresh water directly to the quarantine tank to dilute, or prepare more salt solution to enhance. I assume you would be able to tell if the fish were to become irritated, as you seem very confident that the fish is not irritated at this time.

Many hobbyists simply will not use OTC fish meds, but will use salt, if they use anything. Tonic salt for freshwater fish is a mild medicine that can do them no harm when used properly, and may very well do them some good, as many hobbyists testify.

At a low-dose, the salt bath will help clear the gills of excess mucus, not irritate them.* Ulcers and skin lesions place a burden on the osmoregulatory system, so Iâ??ve read many times, which stresses the fish. If the fish is stressed, and is losing body salts to the surrounding water, then the salt bath can help minimize these losses and keep the fishâ??s salt-to-water ratio in balance, thereby making the fish more comfortable. In this case, I am considering the "tumor," or whatever it is, to be in this category; (because no one knows what it is, do they? The growth hasnâ??t been lanced and sectioned and given for biopsy. The assumption is that itâ??s a tumor, but it could very well be a fluid filled sac, or a condition caused by an internal parasite.)

I have kept several bettas, and they live several years. The one I have right now is just about 3½ years old. I have never seen any growths of any kind on my bettas; possibly this is because they are kept singly in small, but decent-sized, planted tanks by themselves. However, other people I know have used salt baths effectively on bettas, for various parasitic and "fungal" conditions, and even Epsom salt baths (to relieve constipation, which is a fairly common problem with bettas, although probably not the problem with your fish. In that case, the bulge is usually farther down, toward the tail.)

Thereâ??s a lot of information around regarding mild salt baths and fish. Whether you try the salt bath is entirely up to you! I am sure you can do the research for yourselves and decide what you want to do. I suggest the salt bath as a way to make the fish more comfortable; to ease respiration and to possibly draw out any excess fluids building up and rupturing the fish. A salt bath is something you might consider trying, before deciding on euthanasia (which I think you would like to avoid, since there seems to be a huge debate about how to do it properly.) If your fish is not uncomfortable or stressed, perhaps you should do nothing. After all, itâ??s not an open wound.

Zenyfish wrote:
There is one other thing you can do. Someone told me they've done this successfully. Anesthesize the fish (I think they used drinking soda, 7Up). Then cut off the tumor with a razor blade.
Whitey, if you try this, and end up with an open wound, have a nice salt bath standing by for the betta.
Heâ??ll need it! :lol: Seriously, I think you would need a lot more information before trying the above technique, which may very well work - I have no idea.
Well, I hope things work out with your fish. Bettas have a way of grabbing your attention and becoming real pets.
_______
Deborah :D


*higher doses may stimulate mucus production which, I understand, can be a good thing, but with bad, short-term, side effects.

EDIT: changed the word cyprinid.

Posted: 19 Oct 2006, 19:07
by zenyfish
deb,

1. Bettas are not cyprinids.

2. http://www.2cah.com/pandora/Disease.html#Tumor

Posted: 19 Oct 2006, 19:48
by Deb
Whoops. I guess I better change it.

Posted: 28 Oct 2006, 14:07
by srajan101
The lump is even bigger and my mum has discovered that you can see right through it.
Is there a chance that it could be full of air?
He is having trouble swimming so he spends most of the time behind plants where I assume he can balance.

Anyone suggest any other possible reasons?

Posted: 28 Oct 2006, 15:59
by apistomaster
I raise fancy halfmoon Bettas and I do not suffer a fish to live with an illness like this. I believe it's better to euthanize a fish with a problem like this. I'd drop a few alka Seltzer tablets in a jar and place the fish in it. It is a merciful and painless way to handle it.
I think it more cruel to force to live with this problem.

Posted: 30 Oct 2006, 13:16
by MatsP
apistomaster wrote:I raise fancy halfmoon Bettas and I do not suffer a fish to live with an illness like this. I believe it's better to euthanize a fish with a problem like this. I'd drop a few alka Seltzer tablets in a jar and place the fish in it. It is a merciful and painless way to handle it.
I think it more cruel to force to live with this problem.
I appreciate the concern here, but from what I saw on my wifes fish, it was not suffering - it was just as active and apparently happy as before. It just looked different from the original shape...

--
Mats

Posted: 30 Oct 2006, 17:55
by apistomaster
Hey Matt,
I think my difference in perspective is because as a breeder of fish for profit I am just used to merciless culling for the benefit of the strain. This mentality does carry over well when it concerns a pet fish. I just don't have any reason to maintain less than my best and I have no sentimental attachment to what amounts to me as a cash crop and space is always limited. When you're getting 300 to 400 bettas per spawn and maybe 20 % meet my standards, a lot of fish are not allowed to grow up.

Posted: 30 Oct 2006, 19:11
by zenyfish
MatsP wrote:I appreciate the concern here, but from what I saw on my wifes fish, it was not suffering - it was just as active and apparently happy as before. It just looked different from the original shape...

--
Mats
It really depends on the location of the tumor and whether it's benign or malignant ... I don't think one can generalize.