killi69 wrote:I find it difficult to tell them apart.
As to telling them apart, even if the number of tail stripes varies on batesii, the stripes all tend to be rather thin. But what I see on all the photos of sp(1) is a single very wide bold stripe (or again, it might look like two big arcing spots, one on top of the other); the second stripe is so much thinner, and variable (it appears to be missing in some photos). That should help, along with the fork in the tail.
killi69 wrote:Might it be possible that they are wrongly identified on Scotcat also?
In this specific case, I think not, for the reasons I mentioned above. But honestly, I too am leary of websites that post "atypical" looking fish attributed to a particular species; there are even some photos here on PlanetCatfish that I wonder about (nothing personal, @Jools
). But I know that some animals show great variation in coloration within a single species, especially when they range over a wide geographic area. So I'll leave it up to the experts to settle that issue.
killi69 wrote:It would be so much easier if suppliers we able to be more precise about where the fish came from. If it really comes from Cameroon it should be batesii.
Agreed about the suppliers. But if batesii can range from Cameroon to Nigeria and Niger, it's possible that sp(1) can also range from Nigeria into Cameroon, I suppose (unless people know otherwise). So maybe the fish can be from Cameroon and still be sp(1).