Scientific Describing Of Fish

A members area where you can introduce yourself, discuss anything outwith catfish and generally get to know each other.
Post Reply
User avatar
Silurus
Posts: 12411
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
I've donated: $12.00!
My articles: 55
My images: 890
My catfish: 1
My cats species list: 90 (i:1, k:0)
Spotted: 423
Location 1: Singapore
Location 2: Moderator Emeritus

Re: Scientific Describing Of Fish

Post by Silurus »

racoll wrote:
Mike Noren wrote:There is even a trend to describe fish ONLY from DNA analyses, because it is much faster than doing morphological analyses, a trend I personally consider harmful and misguided.
People always say this, but it just isn't happening. I would love to see some examples Mike? One that springs to my mind is the woeful description of three Hemidactylus geckos by Leache and Fujita (2010), but I can't think of many others.
This works better for invertebrates with little in the way of morphological characters (e.g. oligochaetes).

Here is a recently-published example. Other oligochaete examples are referred to in the text.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Speak Easy”