Catfish spines as defense

For the discussion of catfish systematics. Post here to draw our attention to new publications or to discuss existing works.
Post Reply
User avatar
Silurus
Posts: 12420
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
I've donated: $12.00!
My articles: 55
My images: 893
My catfish: 1
My cats species list: 90 (i:1, k:0)
Spotted: 424
Location 1: Singapore
Location 2: Moderator Emeritus

Catfish spines as defense

Post by Silurus »

Bosher, BT, SH Newton & ML Fine, 2006. The spines of the channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, as an anti-predator adaptation: An experimental study. Ethology 112: 188â??195.

Abstract

Although experimental evidence is lacking, the stout pectoral spine of catfishes has been interpreted as a defensive adaptation. The spine can be rigidly locked and abducted to produce stridulation sounds, which have been hypothesized to serve a warning function. We studied spine function in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) as a deterrent to predation by largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) by presenting individuals with pairs of catfish, one with its pectoral spines clipped and the other intact. The number of initial attacks on clipped and intact fish was similar, suggesting that bass do not recognize the spine visually. Bass showed evidence of learning across trials, striking clipped fish fewer times and consuming them. Conversely, intact fish were attacked more than clipped ones because intact fish were repeatedly disgorged and attacked again, suggesting that bass become sensitized to the spine. Ingestion times were longer for intact than clipped fish, and fewer intact fish were eaten. Eighty-eight percent of intact fish survived in the mouth of a bass one or more times. Catfish did not stridulate or use their spines to deter initial attacks, refuting the warning hypothesis. Locking and stridulation motions, only observed when catfish were held inside the mouth of a bass, did not deter subsequent attacks indicating that neither the spine nor stridulation carry a warning function. It is possible, therefore, that stridulation sounds function as a distress call. The spine functions against a gape-limited predator by increasing the difficulty of ingestion but not capture.
Image
djw66
Posts: 205
Joined: 29 May 2005, 02:39
Location 1: Arkansas
Location 2: Arkansas

Post by djw66 »

Silurus,

A very, very interesting study. I've often wondered about the very thing. Of course, south of the border . . .

I quote Innes in describing a doradid: "A larger fish picking it up as a morsel of food would receive a sensation somewhat as though it had taken up a chestnut burr into it's mouth."

In this 1953 edition of Exotic Aquarium Fishes, Innes lists scientific name for the fish was Acanthodoras spinosissimus (Eigenmann and Eigenmann). Translates to very, very spiny doras.

No wonder the doradids are such a sucessful bunch.

Dave
I dream of L-Numbers . . .
User avatar
racoll
Posts: 5258
Joined: 26 Jan 2004, 12:18
My articles: 6
My images: 182
My catfish: 2
My cats species list: 2 (i:2, k:0)
My aquaria list: 1 (i:0)
Spotted: 238
Location 1: London
Location 2: UK

Post by racoll »

It's my understanding that the bass (and many other predators) don't possess weberian apparatus, so they are aren't able to detect the stridulating very well.

I would think the stridulation would be used for disputes among catfish, and maybe mating?

Any thoughts?
Post Reply

Return to “Taxonomy & Science News”