Geophagus72 wrote: 17 Nov 2024, 15:23
Hi.
L333 requires a high-protein diet. While young L333 may eat some vegetables, their diet should shift to meaty foods as they grow. They need bloodworms, chopped mussels, chopped cockles, or prawns. They don’t eat algae and won’t touch algae wafers.
Just weighing in on Hypancistrus diets as the argument is used but diet detracts from the entire issue.
There is no evidence they are carnivorous. Omnivorous is an awful term, it's so broad so much so you could say all animals are omnivorous just because at one point they consume something else. I'm not the fan of specific labels either but they give an idea. As Hypancistrus sp. L333 and L066 are not described there lacks any studies into their ecology, there is little need to either as they are not a model taxa opposed to just Ancistrus sp. but as a genus as whole they are useful.
First I must clear the protein bias, people are seeing protein as just protein and not the source of proteins. There is literally no evidence for these fishes needing high or low protein long term, given there is a short reproductive lifespan under common diets particularly where protein is the only focus it says a lot.
So we have information on what Hypancistrus feed on in the wild. The majority are what many would say omnivores but this shows how vague omnivory is. They largely feed on algaes, detritus (a vague term but avoid adding personal bias to the term) and a small negotiable amount of invertebrates. The detritus given none can be tracked to invertebrates of course soft bodied inverts are a possibility but are likely bacteria and protozoa. One thing that is noted is seeds. Hypancistrus like the Peckoltia group in general have reasonably strong jaws but lack the dentary to feed on a carnivorous diet like Scobinancistrus (makes a good comparison). It's more then likely they are feeding in areas tough to feed on, leading onto the great wood excavating adaptations of that clade in Panaqolus. We see that in H. zebra who feeds on bryozoa, but it's not clear if they digest them.
References
Armbruster, J. W. (2002). Hypancistrus inspector: a new species of suckermouth armored catfish (Loricariidae: Ancistrinae). Copeia, 2002(1), 86-92.
Armbruster, J. W., Lujan, N. K., & Taphorn, D. C. (2007). Four new Hypancistrus (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from Amazonas, Venezuela. Copeia, 2007(1), 62-79.
The reason they might not touch algae wafers might be because many don't contain algae but algae is paraphyletic and they would likely specialist in specific taxa of what they feed on. One interesting thing is when fed a true carnivorous diet (many are high in cereals and vegetables) they are very prone to bloat.
Mussels are high in thiaminase and prawns can be too, the risk of heavy metals is also higher.
The other aspect is vegetables, I would count out vegetables for most Loricariids other then bulking out a diet, almost a filler excluding mushrooms. You'll note how much waste is produced from courgette and cucumber in most species because even algivores it's difficult to digest. Vegetables are so different from algae's who are high in protein. We can't replicate the bacteria sadly but the algae's maybe can get close, remotely.
None of those dry feeds are carnivorous or herbivorous, they are not invertivore diets or algivore diets. Too high in fish meal and cereals. We know even for insectivores that fish meal has issues obtaining nutrition (I can grab the reference for that). The problem is getting fishes to feed on general commercial feeds and Loricariids fall foul of most of these diets.