Now I went through a lot of trouble myself to catch this motion on video, as i newer saw any other proof.
I borrowed a digicam with good macro ability and possibility to shoot video, and a tripod to keep it still while filming. I put up ekstra lightsources and started shooting. All in all i caught 11 blinkings.
I have no doubt that they blink all the way down. I took one of the videos, split it into pictures frame by frame. Have a look:
- First picture is where it starts the blinking, no pupil covered, but the bottom of the Iris is.
- Second picture: Here we have 60% of the pupil covered. All previous posted pics are taken between picture one and two as i have been suspecting.
- Third picture: We now only see just the top of the pupil, 90% of pupil covered below the skull.
- Last picture shows 100% pupil covered, only just a top bit of the Iris can be seen here.
This has nothing to do with seeing or focus. The eye cleaning theory seems to me highly likely, as stated all a long.
I converted the videos to MPEG and burned them on a disc. I could then play them in 1/32 speed on the DVD-player. I have had 5 people to look at this until now, including a biology student. They all back me up, and find my reasoning likely.
My computer is to slow for a good video editing program, and the video-editing i could get a hold of causes loss of resolution on the film while processing. I am working on getting unlimited server space to share original video with You (over 100 mB of blinking cory action).
Until then, all of you who have interest are very welcome to pm me Your email, and i will then send you a 1,5 mB AVI-movie that shows the action accurately. Note that this is not the same film as the shots in top of this post is from, thereby i have more than one proof.
Kr Allan