What are the chances

[-carlo]

https://imgur.com/a/Zyi42El
Three of the best corydoras

[bekateen]

Another winner! (the prize being joy)

[Mol_PMB]

First time I've spotted one of these. Must be my lucky week!

Paul M-B

[bekateen]

I don't believe I've gotten a threesome of these before.

[bekateen]

Another 3-some... No, that sounds wrong. Another 3-way... yeah, that's better.

[Dave Rinaldo]

55.JPG (18.92 KiB) Viewed 25144 times

[bekateen]

Another hit today.

[bekateen]

On the tail of Jools updating the code affecting fish heads updates. With the new code refreshing with each page, I expect we'll see threesomes more often.

[bekateen]

Do I see a new fish in the header?

19)

Otocinclus macrospilus

?

Cheers, Eric

[Jools]

Yes, I wondered how long it would take for someone to notice and post. Although we must thank @craft for his design. I think it's O. vittatus though.

Jools

[bekateen]

Chances are a lot better now that the images refresh so often, but still rare.

Cheers, Eric

[bekateen]

So far, this is the only time I've seen two of the new Otocinclus. Haven't gotten three of a kind yet.

Cheers, Eric

[bekateen]

Tonight

[Catfish-ologist]

I just got my first triple!

[Catfish-ologist]

Is it even possible to have 2 in one day?

[Jools]

Boom! I need to add another one so you guys can go hunting for it. Any suggestions?

Jools

[bekateen]

And again!

[thijsaquarium]

I just discovered this old post.

Didn't even notice they changed haha. Very fun though!

[bekateen]

Been a while for me.

[Jools]

Interesting timing with your post - there is a new for 2022 (but I was a year late)

Trichomycterus

that I added a short while back. Also made the

Otocinclus

and

Hyalobagrus

"swim" in mid-water too...

Here's the whole gang for 2023. The 14 (lucky 13 if you count from 0) and last images are blanks.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.



Jools

[bekateen]

How does this look?

Bagrichthys hypselopterus.png (10.62 KiB) Viewed 12500 times

Or this:

Bagrichthys hypselopterus 2.png (13.35 KiB) Viewed 12500 times

Here's a third try, same image as second, but with a lower color depth (16 vs 256):

Bagrichthys hypselopterus 2.16 small.png (13.13 KiB) Viewed 12494 times

And a 4th try, with a lighter background before choosing the transparency:

Bagrichthys hypselopterus 2.2.png (13.37 KiB) Viewed 12491 times

And one last one:

Bagrichthys hypselopterus large 256 small transparent.png (10.4 KiB) Viewed 12483 times

Blurry, in my opinion, but I'm not an artist. There's only so far IrfanView will take me.

Cheers, Eric

[bekateen]

20.

FYI, there's a white (not transparent) vertical line on the right margin of this fish, which shows up on the header:

I may have fixed it, but not sure:

19.png (10.15 KiB) Viewed 12489 times

The flaw is not present in either the 1/2 fish or the 1/4 fish, just the whole fish for Otocinclus.

Cheers, Eric

[Jools]

On the lancer, I like the top one, need it pretty hi-res to start with? It might look a bit odd versus the other because the fins are so big the body is disproportionally small. Have fixed the Oto "stripe".

Cheers,

Jools

[Dave Rinaldo]

fixed the Oto "stripe".

Cheers,

Jools

Just now copied this.

planet3.jpg (10.01 KiB) Viewed 12408 times

[bekateen]

@Dave Rinaldo, interesting. You appear to be getting the white seam on the 1/2 fish. When I looked before, the white seam was only on the full-bodied fish. Even now I don't see it on the 1/2 fish, but I do still see it on the full fish. This pic was grabbed March 2 at 5:44 PST:

Cheers, Eric

[Jools]

So, it seems the white line was on all of them. It makes sense as they are copies of the full size one cut down.

Yesterday I fixed the half and small sized ones having fixed the large one a little earlier.

If you see the white line now it’ll be because your browser has cached the older version.

Sorry for all the faff, should be sorted now.

Jools

[bekateen]

What's this dude?

Trichomycterus

?

Cheers, Eric

[Jools]

Trich or treat. The former...

Jools

[bekateen]

Trich or treat. The former...

Jools

It took me a few cycles of page refreshing to get the full body. You replied before I could upload it.

Thanks

[bekateen]

Again: