Interests: Sim racing; cycling (ideally not into the back of stationary dustbin lorries located on blind sweeping bends in wet weather, with rim brakes like chocolate teapots)
I would say lucipinnis for at least two of the photographed fish, but there are three in photos 1 and 2, due to smaller black spots on the head that are much more densely packed than on the body.
There are far better qualified members than me to identify Synos, the above is my opinion, I've only been keeping Mochokidae catfish for just under seven years (various Synodontis spp. and at least two Euchilichthys spp. in my my quartet).
Dreaming of a full-on 5x2x2 Zaire River rapids biotope...
I thought that is petricola because they have many smaller dots on the head.
The lucipinnis I've seen in photos have fewer and much larger dots on the head.
The Petshop where I bought called them Syn.(petricola)lucipinna g.br.
I'm still confused.
Any other opinion??
How big are these exactly (SL)?
They are not what i'd call typical of either species - image 2 in cat-e-log for petricola shows the broad head & many fine body spots - this is not as obvious when the fish is smaller. Some Lucipinnis have smaller dots on the head & the definitive way to differentiate is by looking for the axial pore which is not at all easy to see. @Birger may be able to give his opinion.
In my experience Petricola are pretty uncommon (bordering on rare) & Lucipinnis fairly common. In the UK I've seen Lucipinnis from £4 to £35 depending on size & whether it's a premium charging LFS. Petricola from £15 to £80 with the same criteria. If a label says Syno (Petricola) Lucipinnis it suggests it is Lucipinnis as this used to be called Petricola dwarf before being described to science in 2006
Last edited by Richard B on 07 Feb 2017, 18:45, edited 1 time in total.
Lou: Every young man's fantasy is to have a three-way. Jacob: Yeah not with another fu**!ng guy! Lou: It's still a three-way!