Would it be difficult to add the following data to the "my cats" page for each person:
Distinct families (all & current)
Distinct genus (all & current)
Distinct species (all & current)
--
Mats
my cats: Show count of families, genus, species.
- MatsP
- Posts: 21038
- Joined: 06 Oct 2004, 13:58
- My articles: 4
- My images: 28
- My cats species list: 117 (i:33, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 10 (i:8)
- My BLogs: 4 (i:0, p:97)
- Spotted: 187
- Location 1: North of Cambridge
- Location 2: England.
- Jools
- Expert
- Posts: 16157
- Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 15:25
- My articles: 198
- My images: 948
- My catfish: 237
- My cats species list: 87 (i:237, k:1)
- My BLogs: 7 (i:10, p:202)
- My Wishlist: 23
- Spotted: 450
- Location 1: Middle Earth,
- Location 2: Scotland
- Interests: All things aquatic, Sci-Fi, photography and travel. Oh, and beer.
- Contact:
Re: Improvement to "my cats",
How about subgenera?
Jools
Jools
Owner, AquaticRepublic.com, PlanetCatfish.com & ZebraPleco.com. Please consider donating towards this site's running costs.
- Jools
- Expert
- Posts: 16157
- Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 15:25
- My articles: 198
- My images: 948
- My catfish: 237
- My cats species list: 87 (i:237, k:1)
- My BLogs: 7 (i:10, p:202)
- My Wishlist: 23
- Spotted: 450
- Location 1: Middle Earth,
- Location 2: Scotland
- Interests: All things aquatic, Sci-Fi, photography and travel. Oh, and beer.
- Contact:
Re: Improvement to "my cats",
How about (f:3, g:3) on the righthand side of posts?
Jools
Jools
Owner, AquaticRepublic.com, PlanetCatfish.com & ZebraPleco.com. Please consider donating towards this site's running costs.
- MatsP
- Posts: 21038
- Joined: 06 Oct 2004, 13:58
- My articles: 4
- My images: 28
- My cats species list: 117 (i:33, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 10 (i:8)
- My BLogs: 4 (i:0, p:97)
- Spotted: 187
- Location 1: North of Cambridge
- Location 2: England.
Re: Improvement to "my cats",
Yeah subgenera too! ;)
But ignoring subgenera for now, (f:3, g:4, sp:8) would be nice. [sp because if you add subgenera, s would possibly be confusing, sg/sp are unique].
For the last numberl, species, what I want to distinguish is really the difference between populations and species.
Also when viewing my (or someone elses) "My Cats", I'd like a summary at the to saying:
Families: 3 (including no longer kept: 6)
Genera: 4 (including no longer kept: 7)
Species: 8 (including no longer kept: 18)
Clearly this could be expressed differently, e.g. a table with heading of "current" and "no longer kept" and "total", for example.
--
Mats
But ignoring subgenera for now, (f:3, g:4, sp:8) would be nice. [sp because if you add subgenera, s would possibly be confusing, sg/sp are unique].
For the last numberl, species, what I want to distinguish is really the difference between populations and species.
Also when viewing my (or someone elses) "My Cats", I'd like a summary at the to saying:
Families: 3 (including no longer kept: 6)
Genera: 4 (including no longer kept: 7)
Species: 8 (including no longer kept: 18)
Clearly this could be expressed differently, e.g. a table with heading of "current" and "no longer kept" and "total", for example.
--
Mats