coelacanth wrote:Keeping ornamental fish is largely a luxury activity, whereas eating isn't
I don't necessarily disagree with you, Pete, and am certainly not trying to start a flame war, but this seems to be a slippery slope you're sliding down. Eating may be a necessity, but eating meat, which arguably inflicts "more stress on other organisms than is absolutely necessary", isn't. That was my original tongue-in-cheek point about the fish 'n chips.coelacanth wrote:We have a conscious choice whether or not to inflict more more stress on other organisms than is absolutely necessary, and the routine use of live fish as food for other fish falls on the wrong side of the line as far as I'm concerned.
What about habitat loss, pollution, etc., as a result of human activity which leads to accelerating species extinction? How much of this stress is absolutely necessary?
I'm not saying we shouldn't act humanely to other species. What I am saying is that we are conducting genocide (in the literal sense) on an unprecedented scale, and that fact deserves our attention as much or more than the lives of individual feeder fish.
OK, off my soapbox.
Dinyar