L134 or not?
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 10 Jan 2010, 15:05
- My cats species list: 1 (i:0, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 1 (i:1)
- Location 2: Finland
L134 or not?
This young pleco was sold to me as L134, but I suspects its not of that species... The pleco is hiding most of the time, behind a piece of driftwood, but I managed to get some pics...
Would like to know the species and possibly gender too?
Would like to know the species and possibly gender too?
- MatsP
- Posts: 21038
- Joined: 06 Oct 2004, 13:58
- My articles: 4
- My images: 28
- My cats species list: 117 (i:33, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 10 (i:8)
- My BLogs: 4 (i:0, p:97)
- Spotted: 187
- Location 1: North of Cambridge
- Location 2: England.
Re: L134 or not?
Looks like . But it's not that easy to say from those photos. I can certainly say it's NOT .
The photos aren't clear enough that I can tell if it's a male or female.
--
Mats
The photos aren't clear enough that I can tell if it's a male or female.
--
Mats
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 10 Jan 2010, 15:05
- My cats species list: 1 (i:0, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 1 (i:1)
- Location 2: Finland
Re: L134 or not?
Just as I suspected. I'll put up some better photos for betted ID if I manage to get some, as I said, its always hiding and with my crappy camera it's hard to get a decent pic.
- AleGer
- Posts: 455
- Joined: 14 Jan 2008, 09:25
- My articles: 2
- My images: 31
- My cats species list: 34 (i:21, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 6 (i:0)
- My BLogs: 13 (i:53, p:562)
- Spotted: 8
- Location 1: Ukraine, Kiev
- Location 2: Ukraine, Kiev
- Interests: Fishing
Re: L134 or not?
It is Not L134. As far I know L134's belly is with out any pattern.
And such belly pattern as at the photo has Panaque.
And such belly pattern as at the photo has Panaque.
-
- Posts: 606
- Joined: 26 May 2007, 22:35
- My images: 30
- Spotted: 20
- Location 1: Ludwigsburg - Germany
- Location 2: Ludwigsburg - Germany
Re: L134 or not?
Hi,
as mentionned before the photos are not good enough for a definite answer.
My guess would be Panaqolus cf. maccus (LDA 67), 100% no L 134.
Cheers,
as mentionned before the photos are not good enough for a definite answer.
My guess would be Panaqolus cf. maccus (LDA 67), 100% no L 134.
Cheers,
--
Karsten
Karsten
- krazyGeoff
- Posts: 764
- Joined: 16 Nov 2007, 06:03
- I've donated: $110.00!
- My articles: 2
- My images: 12
- My cats species list: 27 (i:1, k:1)
- My aquaria list: 16 (i:8)
- My BLogs: 7 (i:7, p:410)
- Spotted: 7
- Location 1: Woodville
- Location 2: New Zealand
- Interests: Fish and Cats
Re: L134 or not?
Hi Sophiru,
I agree with Mats.
These hit the market last year with the same label. Here is my post about them.
http://www.planetcatfish.com/forum/view ... 13&t=25816
They are still a really nice little fish though.
Geoff
I agree with Mats.
These hit the market last year with the same label. Here is my post about them.
http://www.planetcatfish.com/forum/view ... 13&t=25816
They are still a really nice little fish though.
Geoff