Horabagrinae?
- Suckermouth
- Posts: 1609
- Joined: 28 Nov 2003, 14:29
- My images: 17
- My cats species list: 22 (i:0, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 2 (i:0)
- My BLogs: 6 (i:0, p:237)
- Spotted: 14
- Location 1: USA
- Location 2: Washington, DC
Horabagrinae?
I know this isn't technically news, but it is taxonomy related. So I was looking over the Ferraris 2007 Catfish checklist, and I noticed at the end it lists a few papers and such that were published in 2006 after the cut-off date. One of these such publications is "Catfishes of India" by Jayaram. Apparently he describes the subfamily Horabagrinae as a subfamily to Schilbidae. Is this accepted? If so, shouldn't Cat-eLog entries for Horabagrus be moved?
- Milton Tan
Research Scientist @ Illinois Natural History Survey
Research Scientist @ Illinois Natural History Survey
- Silurus
- Posts: 12420
- Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
- I've donated: $12.00!
- My articles: 55
- My images: 893
- My catfish: 1
- My cats species list: 90 (i:1, k:0)
- Spotted: 424
- Location 1: Singapore
- Location 2: Moderator Emeritus
Re: Horabagrinae?
Recent studies on the molecular phylogeny of catfishes have indicated that Horabagrus should be placed in its own family (Horabagridae).
- Jools
- Expert
- Posts: 16148
- Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 15:25
- My articles: 198
- My images: 948
- My catfish: 237
- My cats species list: 87 (i:237, k:1)
- My BLogs: 7 (i:10, p:202)
- My Wishlist: 23
- Spotted: 450
- Location 1: Middle Earth,
- Location 2: Scotland
- Interests: All things aquatic, Sci-Fi, photography and travel. Oh, and beer.
- Contact:
Re: Horabagrinae?
Yup, I've been aware of that for a while. I wasn't sure of the level of usage/acceptance of the change mind you.
Jools
Jools
Owner, AquaticRepublic.com, PlanetCatfish.com & ZebraPleco.com. Please consider donating towards this site's running costs.
- Suckermouth
- Posts: 1609
- Joined: 28 Nov 2003, 14:29
- My images: 17
- My cats species list: 22 (i:0, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 2 (i:0)
- My BLogs: 6 (i:0, p:237)
- Spotted: 14
- Location 1: USA
- Location 2: Washington, DC
Re: Horabagrinae?
Ah yes, I did read that in Sullivan et al 2006. Why is it that this hasn't been "accepted" yet?Silurus wrote:Recent studies on the molecular phylogeny of catfishes have indicated that Horabagrus should be placed in its own family (Horabagridae).
- Milton Tan
Research Scientist @ Illinois Natural History Survey
Research Scientist @ Illinois Natural History Survey
- Jools
- Expert
- Posts: 16148
- Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 15:25
- My articles: 198
- My images: 948
- My catfish: 237
- My cats species list: 87 (i:237, k:1)
- My BLogs: 7 (i:10, p:202)
- My Wishlist: 23
- Spotted: 450
- Location 1: Middle Earth,
- Location 2: Scotland
- Interests: All things aquatic, Sci-Fi, photography and travel. Oh, and beer.
- Contact:
Re: Horabagrinae?
Could just be that nothing subsequent has been published that would need to reference the change. Catalog of fishes, Fishbase and ACSI don't use it (yet?). I wasn't planning on being the first to "jump".Suckermouth wrote:Ah yes, I did read that in Sullivan et al 2006. Why is it that this hasn't been "accepted" yet?Silurus wrote:Recent studies on the molecular phylogeny of catfishes have indicated that Horabagrus should be placed in its own family (Horabagridae).
Jools
Owner, AquaticRepublic.com, PlanetCatfish.com & ZebraPleco.com. Please consider donating towards this site's running costs.