am I a female L 333 ?

katmandu · Post by **katmandu** » 01 Feb 2008, 07:23

here i'm

regards

Katmandu

drpleco · Post by **drpleco** » 01 Feb 2008, 16:11

could be. It looks female to me, but I'd need to know more about it.

was it sold as 333? and what size is it?

katmandu · Post by **katmandu** » 01 Feb 2008, 23:12

hi

no.i bought from a guy,who thought it is L 66,ofcourse it is not.i think it is L 333, it is now about 3.5 inches

regards

Tom

apistomaster · Post by **apistomaster** » 02 Feb 2008, 07:54

I get the impression it is a female too, but it also appears a little young to sex.

katmandu · Post by **katmandu** » 03 Feb 2008, 23:13

thanks for info

are females are less agresive than males,she

is very calm.

thanks again

Katmandu

drpleco · Post by **drpleco** » 04 Feb 2008, 05:50

theoretically, I suppose they could be considered less agressive buy only because they're less likely to fighot for caves. 333 females are known for not being as prone to using caves, so they might be considered less aggressive for that reason. But fighting for other reasons would be another story. Mine aren't aggressive at all, but that's just one perspective. If it's a young fish, it's also less likely to show aggression.

am I a female L 333 ?

am I a female L 333 ?

Re: am I a female L 333 ?

Re: am I a female L 333 ?

Re: am I a female L 333 ?

Re: am I a female L 333 ?

Re: am I a female L 333 ?