L024?

[Chrysichthys]

This was sold as a 'serratus pleco':

[MatsP]

Looks a bit like this:
http://www.planetcatfish.com/catelog/sp ... ies_id=865

--
Mats

[Silurus]

More like

Pseudacanthicus sp_cf_serratus

[Chrysichthys]

Here's a better image. I'm still thinking L024 because of the reddish colouration. (It doesn't stand out in the pic because the water is full of bogwood tannins).

The English Aqualog refers to L024 as Pseudacanthicus serratus. However, the Cat-eLog doesn't, so my question is whether P. serratus is a legitimate species, given that Aqualog is often wrong.

An I.D. on the pleco at the bottom of the pic it would be welcome. It was sold as a Snakeskin pleco. I think it's a Hypostomus but I don't know which species.

[Acid John]

Is the lower fish L037.

[racoll]

I will also go for

Pseudacanthicus sp(l024)

.

Your fish seems a good match with this one.....



Yours does appear quite flat in the photo, but thats probably the angle.

The English Aqualog refers to L024 as Pseudacanthicus serratus. However, the Cat-eLog doesn't, so my question is whether P. serratus is a legitimate species, given that Aqualog is often wrong.

P. serratus is a valid species, but it comes from Surinam.

P. serratus may well be very similar to the L024 from the Tocatins, but its probably best to stick to L024 as a name.

The

Pseudacanthicus sp_cf_serratus

(L063) is also from the Tocatins, but seems to be a more dark grey in colour.

Both L063 and L024 are probably both similar enough to be called P. cf. serratus, but its more descriptive to refer to the L numbers I think.

[Chrysichthys]

Is the lower fish L037.

Yes, thanks, I think you are right. I didn't know that it even had an L number.

[Chrysichthys]

Your fish seems a good match with this one.....

Yes, that's good enough for me.