size wrong on L70

kwalker · Post by **kwalker** » 09 Jun 2007, 16:33

jools

i feel the size is incorrect on the L-70. my specimen is much larger than the 3.9sl. i can have turley confirm this. matbe closer to 5.5sl. will send you new pics as well.

kw

MatsP · Post by **MatsP** » 12 Jun 2007, 11:29

I'd be happy to fix up the size if you give me a photo to show the size (fish next to a ruler/tape-measuer is the best way).

I'm fully aware that MANY of the measures in the Cat-eLog are incorrect - because there's no other "better" data.

By the way, the reason I ask for a photo is more to the point that a lot of people (me included) have a hard time determining size of fish when they are in the tank - only when they are laid out next to a tape-measure do you get their REAL size.

--
Mats

YouTube · Post by **Jools** » 13 Jun 2007, 13:29

I've got the photo and I think 5.5cm sl is good.

Jools

MatsP · Post by **MatsP** » 13 Jun 2007, 13:33

Jools wrote:I've got the photo and I think 5.5cm sl is good.

Jools

I presume you mean 5.5 INCHES -> 140mm?

--
Mats

YouTube · Post by **Jools** » 13 Jun 2007, 13:39

HOWEVER, I've had a closer look at the picture and that's no ! At least from what I can tell from the pictures you sent Ken. It looks like an adult .

Jools

kwalker · Post by **kwalker** » 24 Jun 2007, 14:02

jools,

i will work to get a closer photo of the fish in question. will also try to get a better size and send over.

kw

YouTube · Post by **Jools** » 24 Jun 2007, 14:19

OK, thanks!

Jools