Anaspidoglanis akiri

For the discussion of catfish systematics. Post here to draw our attention to new publications or to discuss existing works.
Post Reply
User avatar
Silurus
Posts: 12426
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
I've donated: $12.00!
My articles: 55
My images: 893
My catfish: 1
My cats species list: 90 (i:1, k:0)
Spotted: 424
Location 1: Singapore
Location 2: Moderator Emeritus

Anaspidoglanis akiri

Post by Silurus »

T Geerinckx , D Adriaens, GG Teugels & W Verraes, 2003. Taxonomic evaluation and redescription of <i>Anaspidoglanis akiri</i> (Risch, 1987) (Siluriformes : Claroteidae). Cybium, 27: 17-25.

Since 1991, the African catfish <i>Auchenoglanis akiri</i> Risch, 1987 has been included in the genus <i>Parauchenoglanis</i>. An extensive re-analysis of the genera <i>Parauchenoglanis</i> and <i>Anaspidoglanis</i>, however, provides evidence for a closer affinity of <i>A. akiri</i> with the species of the genus <i>Anaspidoglanis</i>, which have a more depressed body and a different head morphology. Both biometric (using 294 specimens) and morphological (external and osteological) evidence supports this generic shift. Consequently, <i>Auchenoglanis akiri</i> has been transferred to the genus <i>Anaspidoglanis</i>, and given a redescription. The most important characters that allow to identify the species are: a thin skin covering the eyes, a premaxillary toothplate measuring 22 to 27% of the head length, a moderately broad snout, and completely in-sed branchiostegal membranes.
Image
User avatar
Dinyar
Posts: 1286
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 00:34
My articles: 3
My images: 227
My catfish: 10
My cats species list: 3 (i:10, k:0)
Spotted: 94
Location 1: New York, NY, USA
Interests: Mochokidae, Claroteidae, Bagridae, Malepteruridae, Chacidae, Heteropneustidae, Clariidae, Sisoridae, Loricariiadae

Post by Dinyar »

What are "in-sed branchiostegal membranes"?

Dinyar
User avatar
Silurus
Posts: 12426
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
I've donated: $12.00!
My articles: 55
My images: 893
My catfish: 1
My cats species list: 90 (i:1, k:0)
Spotted: 424
Location 1: Singapore
Location 2: Moderator Emeritus

Post by Silurus »

Probably a typo for "in-set branchiostegal membranes". I just cut and pasted the abstract from Science Citation Index.
Don't ask me what "in-set branchiostegal membranes" are...I haven't seen the paper yet.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Taxonomy & Science News”