Callichthys catfish
Callichthys catfish
I have an armored catfish I got from the lfs. It is about 3 inches long and dark brown. It swims all over the tank constantly, regardless of the time of day. It feeds a lot from the top of the tank. Is it probably the Callichthys callichthys catfish? I can't find much info on them.
- MatsP
- Posts: 21038
- Joined: 06 Oct 2004, 13:58
- My articles: 4
- My images: 28
- My cats species list: 117 (i:33, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 10 (i:8)
- My BLogs: 4 (i:0, p:97)
- Spotted: 187
- Location 1: North of Cambridge
- Location 2: England.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 5038
- Joined: 19 Dec 2004, 14:38
- My articles: 20
- My images: 61
- My catfish: 9
- Spotted: 35
- Location 2: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- MatsP
- Posts: 21038
- Joined: 06 Oct 2004, 13:58
- My articles: 4
- My images: 28
- My cats species list: 117 (i:33, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 10 (i:8)
- My BLogs: 4 (i:0, p:97)
- Spotted: 187
- Location 1: North of Cambridge
- Location 2: England.
You're obviously splitting hairs: A size-range of around 5-8 inches is "similar" to me, and the overall body shape and colouring isn't quite the same for the group, but they aren't exactly "worlds apart" either.Marc van Arc wrote:Clicking the links will surely make clear that the above statement isn't quite correct.MatsP wrote:They behave and look similar, and grow to similar sizes.
As far as I'm aware, the behaviour is also at least not worlds apart. So for someone who isn't specifically knowledgeable in "Larger callichtyidae", then I would say the my statement is reasonable.
If I've missed something obvious, then please enlighten me.
--
Mats
-
- Posts: 2913
- Joined: 21 Dec 2006, 20:35
- My images: 1
- My cats species list: 28 (i:0, k:0)
- Spotted: 8
- Location 1: the Netherlands
- Location 2: Nijmegen the Netherlands
- Interests: Central American and Uruguayan fishes
I once ended up with a littorale in order to find a mate for my thoracum male
Thus I can only agree they do look a lot alike, but the littorale grew to almost 18 cm, one and a half time the thoracum's size. She also was much more active, especially during daylight
now, 8 years late,r the thoracum had died of old age, and the littorale is dying too - but still swimming.
So, based on these experiences, I can only agree very limited with Mats, agreeing more with Marc.
Thus I can only agree they do look a lot alike, but the littorale grew to almost 18 cm, one and a half time the thoracum's size. She also was much more active, especially during daylight
now, 8 years late,r the thoracum had died of old age, and the littorale is dying too - but still swimming.
So, based on these experiences, I can only agree very limited with Mats, agreeing more with Marc.
- MatsP
- Posts: 21038
- Joined: 06 Oct 2004, 13:58
- My articles: 4
- My images: 28
- My cats species list: 117 (i:33, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 10 (i:8)
- My BLogs: 4 (i:0, p:97)
- Spotted: 187
- Location 1: North of Cambridge
- Location 2: England.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 5038
- Joined: 19 Dec 2004, 14:38
- My articles: 20
- My images: 61
- My catfish: 9
- Spotted: 35
- Location 2: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
This is not a matter of being right or being wrong, but it struck me that you wrote it. I've got to know you as someone who is precise; I only have to refer to the numerous questions and remarks you've made on behalf of the Cat-eLog.MatsP wrote:
You're obviously splitting hairs: A size-range of around 5-8 inches is "similar" to me, and the overall body shape and colouring isn't quite the same for the group, but they aren't exactly "worlds apart" either.
As far as I'm aware, the behaviour is also at least not worlds apart. So for someone who isn't specifically knowledgeable in "Larger callichtyidae", then I would say the my statement is reasonable.
If I've missed something obvious, then please enlighten me.
In my opinion the differences between both species are too large to oversee: size, colour and shape. The most obvious feature that gives H. littorale away is the V-shaped caudal. The behaviour is indeed quite alike.
But again, it's just a remark.
Pier had (has?) the true and and of course then it's even more easy to distinguish them.
There's only one Callichthyid that may be mistaken for a (juvenile) Callichthys callichthys and that's
(at least in my case; twice actually).
Btw: in the mean time Dax' problem seems to have been solved.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 5038
- Joined: 19 Dec 2004, 14:38
- My articles: 20
- My images: 61
- My catfish: 9
- Spotted: 35
- Location 2: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
-
- Expert
- Posts: 5038
- Joined: 19 Dec 2004, 14:38
- My articles: 20
- My images: 61
- My catfish: 9
- Spotted: 35
- Location 2: Eindhoven, The Netherlands