It should be safe to assign variants to all pictures. The "do not move this image" relates to articles that link to the image - the image link is not changed by the variant information, it is just used to select which images to show when selecting a specific variant (and if you "don't set it") the ...

I can't say for absolute sure that it is exactly L180, but it's definitely not a Rio Ucayali or something like that. The fish in the photo is not the typical Ancistrus body, it's flatter than the typical one - similar to A. macrophtalmus and A. ranunculus (not quite as wide and flat as A. ranunculus ...

Paru (Venezuela) or Paru (Ventuari) would be the pattern used previously.

--
Mats

Yes, so I would absolutely make those pins different in some way - maybe a + instead of * or dot in the marker - perhaps even a special one for "our own data". And I think the idea of importing those markers rather than asking GBIF for each one - if nothing else because I think it'll be much faster ...

Ok, I'm skipping over MOST of the discussion, and commenting on a few of Eric's comments... If the waterway was originally entered with a specific Lat/Long coordinate corresponding to a specific collection locality for once species, then that pin is more important than just "midway" along the river ...

I don't know what to add here. The data is entered largely by me (not counting the "type locality" markers). It is my fault if it's wrong, and usually it's because I have no "better knowledge". I'm not sure if everyone commenting here has access to the database for updating localities, but if you ...

It's over 24 months now, and we still seem to have more than 2 species... ;)

--
Mats

Completely missed the stack overflow error. I will try to look into that. I can reproduce on my machine. Probably won't do anything on that until at least Monday.

--
Mats

It seems to work, once I reloaded the page properly (Ctrl-F5).

--
Mats

It's not just the Rio Purus. I just found this problem again when looking at the profiles for Corydoras sp(c140) and Leptorhamdia marmorata . They're from the Negro. But again, same circumstance - only one occurrence, nothing more specific than Negro, and no Lat/Long data for type locality. I haven ...

There is a bit of code that runs when Jools vets the update, which tries to parse the coordinates out of the type locality field. It doesn't ALWAYS work, especially if there's something a bit weird in there. It's REALLY not easy to write code that does this. But it's better than expecting you, me or ...

Yeah, I figured out what the problem is. When trying to figure out the "scale" to fit everything in, the code would divide by zero (or something like that) when there is only ONE entry on the map - which was leading to "weird" results in the remaining math. It works out SOMETIMES, but not always, so ...

I will have a look. Note that it's not what it says in the distribution as such that matters, but what it says in the "occurrence" records for that species. The coordinates in the database for Rio Purus should show this: https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/5%C2%B041'42.9%22S+64%C2%B019'11.6%22W/@-5 ...

We really should be more generous with what symbols we accept as ' and " symbols. They can be terribly hard to spot the difference (when in doubt, use only the single quote ' - two of them for second, one for minute).

--
Mats

The best shops I've been to is Nols Ciklidhobby (Just north of Gothenburg) and Aquazoo (a good hours drive south of Gothenburg). I haven't been, but Akvarielagret in Bromma (just outside Stockholm) has had good reviews.

I have asked on a Swedish Facebook group, will forward any replies...

--
Mats

I'd say so.

--
Mats

Ok, I have made another update, which I _think_ is what I wrote last time, give or take.

--
Mats

Hi Jools and Mats, Is there any way to remove or block the "Add to My Cats" link on the L144 CLOG, so that more people in the future don't sign up for this fish again as being theirs? I suspect that this is probably way more difficult than it sounds, since I expect that it's more of an element ...

And I have finally got round to doing what I said I would do yesterday. Came home yesterday with a head feeling like it had been shrunk two sizes, so went to bed after watching the motorcycle racing.

Anyways, R1588 contains a few lines of updates to the article...

--
Mats

I'm not sure whether another amelanistic fish was imported, or if the mutation occurred naturally. It's of course possible that it occurred naturally too. But if someone gets a lone male that is amelanistic, what females would you breed it with? (If it's a female amelanistic fish, it may be harder ...

The map shows the correct location according to the type locality text, which contains the coordinates of 28°00.377'N, 95°45.562'W (You can see for yourself if you copy that into Google maps) I'm happy to correct it, but I need to know what the actual coordinates should be... The paper is "paywalled" ...

My typing isn't getting any better, is it...

I will have another look at it - I think it's related to the old "lets name these URL-variables differently between phases" that we have in some of the admin pages.

--
Mats

Not getting any errors from PHP any longer, but unfortunately not working either.

Will spend some time on this over the weeken

--
Mats

I'm looking at this - should be relatively easy to fix, I think (I have already fixed the exact one that was in your post, but then immediately tripped over another of the same kind, so good thing I tested locally before sending a fix to Jools...)

--
Mats

I think changes in R1557-1559 will fix this problem (in fact, I tested it on my local setup, and it appears to work).

--
Mats

Pretty sure the problem is in the first layer of code, where you enter the data and submit it to the DB. It looks HTML-ized in the database, and I think the problem is the request_var() that "encodes" things, even tho' we don't want it. I will do some more digging today, as didn't get much done last ...

It has "HTML-ised" the HTML code. Which it shouldn't. Not sure why. Will have a look tomorrow, to see if there's anything obviously wrong there....

--
Mats

So, Marc: Does this show what you expect, now?

--
Mats

R1552-1553 has an updated version that copes with "more than one species has the same number of keepers".

--
Mats

Just found an interesting feature, however. If two species has the exact same number of keepers, only one is being displayed.... ;)

Probably need to come up with a better way to maintain a "most kept" list. Will try to do this today.

--
Mats